Skip to comments.
Is the Earth’s Climate History Largely a Fraud?
Powerline ^
| September 19,2017
| John Hinderaker
Posted on 09/20/2017 3:52:37 PM PDT by Hojczyk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
09/20/2017 3:52:37 PM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
Or, if not a fraud from the outset, at least largely conjectural?
Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's far beyond time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon. Lets get the job done. Please chip in.
President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
President Donald J. Trump's address to the United Nations on 09/19/2017.
Ramirez political cartoon: Football Referee Signals LARGE VERSION 09/20/2017: LINK LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Garrison political cartoon: Irrelevence Park LARGE VERSION 09/19/2017: LINK LINK (scroll down) to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic. If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project. LINK
FReepers, 94.00% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met. Click above and pencil in your donation now. Please folks, lets end this FReepathon. Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...
Just $877.00 dollars and cents to 95.00%
3
posted on
09/20/2017 3:59:49 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: Hojczyk
Replete with fraud and fraudsters.
To: Hojczyk
So much of modern science isn’t science at all. It’s just politics. But it’s a political ideology which claims: “You can’t argue with me — this is settled science.”
It’s pretty easy to see this with Climate Change. I maintain that it is also true with Evolution. Much of that stuff is make-believe.
5
posted on
09/20/2017 4:02:08 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: Hojczyk
No smoking hot spot David Evans - THE AUSTRALIAN July 18, 2008 1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.
If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.
6
posted on
09/20/2017 4:02:54 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
To: Hojczyk
This is, in my opinion, the greatest scandal in the history of science.
If we were a Nation of Laws it might matter, but we are a Nation of Men.
7
posted on
09/20/2017 4:04:42 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(Idle hands are the Devil's workshop)
To: Hojczyk
The global warming climatistas are certainly frauds and should be subject to arrest and prosecution.
To: Hojczyk
‘If’ you had ‘reliable data’ from 100 years ago, and you were able
to put that data into a mathematical model to show today’s climate...
If they could do that, then they ‘might’ be able to predict the future.
The problem is twofold:
they do not have reliable data, and their mathematical models do not work.
9
posted on
09/20/2017 4:25:38 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Or, if not a fraud from the outset, at least largely conjectural?
_______________________________________________________
It was blatant fraud from the outset.
It doesn’t take a whole hella lot of academic archaeology to find the scumbags that started this crap bragging about how it will help further the glorious Communist revolution by manipulating “The West” into destroying its own industrial and economic infrastructure.
10
posted on
09/20/2017 4:26:39 PM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: ClearCase_guy
CCG:
"I maintain that it is also true with Evolution. Much of that stuff is make-believe." Important differences, including:
- Evolution theory is 150+ years old, not of recent origin or funded by government grants.
- Evolution theory was developed to explain confirmed observations (aka: facts) such as fossils and geological strata.
It did not originate in some computer model using bogus temperature data.
- Evolution theory does not require a vast international bureaucracy, new laws & taxes to enforce.
It is not used to elect politicians or raise taxes.
- Evolution theory & assumptions are confirmed across multiple scientific disciplines, from A-astronomy to Z-zoology.
AGW is confirmed by... well, politicians!
- If evolution theory is ever falsified, it will surprise a good many people and overturn many scientific understandings, but otherwise life will go on as usual.
By contrast, falsifying AGW will have great political & economic implications.
That's why I think evolution theory belongs in a different category from the AGW "scientific consensus".
11
posted on
09/20/2017 4:37:38 PM PDT
by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective...)
To: Grimmy
to make it worse, there will soon be new generations in control, who have been brainwashed into thinking there was no such thing as “climate change” before the scammers manufactured “manmade global warming”.
12
posted on
09/20/2017 4:39:54 PM PDT
by
MAGAthon
To: Hojczyk
“Is the Earths Climate History Largely a Fraud?”
No, it is very true. What is a fraud is the people that have given lying opinions of it.
rwood
To: Hojczyk
When thinking about "climate change" I'm reminded of a science documentary I saw a few years ago.It said that there's irrefutable evidence that only a few thousand years ago the small piece of land that's now Central Park (the one in New York City) was completely covered by a glacier at least 2,000 feet thick.
And yet somehow it disappeared long before the invention of the internal combustion engine.
To: eyeamok
“This is, in my opinion, the greatest scandal in the history of science.”
Not only that it’s the greatest financial fraud in the history of man.
To: Hojczyk
16
posted on
09/20/2017 5:18:05 PM PDT
by
roadcat
To: Hojczyk
17
posted on
09/20/2017 5:22:48 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Hojczyk
In Theory there is no difference between Theory and Practice.
In Practice there is.
QED
18
posted on
09/20/2017 5:24:20 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Hojczyk
Is the Earths Climate History Largely a Fraud? Absolutely.
At least doofus Gore's version, which is demonstrably phony.
19
posted on
09/20/2017 6:29:20 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Seriously??)
To: Hojczyk
“We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”
20
posted on
09/20/2017 7:30:49 PM PDT
by
henkster
(The View: A psychiatric group therapy session where the shrink has stepped out of the room.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson