Skip to comments.
Animal Abusers Could Be Made to Register Like Sex Offenders
Fox News Insider ^
| 9/21/17
| As seen on Tucker Carlson Tonight
Posted on 09/22/2017 11:26:08 AM PDT by Boomer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
I am 100% for this and increasing punishment/penalties for harming innocent animals on purpose.
I doubt they would increase it to what I think it should be but every step in that direction helps. Maybe one day we will figure out people who do this have no business living. Period.
1
posted on
09/22/2017 11:26:08 AM PDT
by
Boomer
To: Boomer
How about baby murderers? Do they have to register? Nah. We’ll protect unborn dolphins but slaughter our unborn children.
2
posted on
09/22/2017 11:28:18 AM PDT
by
LouAvul
(The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's far beyond time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon. Lets do it today. Please chip in.
President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
President Donald J. Trump's address to the United Nations on 09/19/2017.
Ramirez political cartoon: Sanctuary State LARGE VERSION 09/21/2017: LINK LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Garrison political cartoon: Good Boy LARGE VERSION 09/22/2017: LINK LINK (scroll down) to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic. If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project. LINK
FReepers, 98.62% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met. Click above and pencil in your donation now. Please folks, lets end this FReepathon. Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...
Just $339.00 dollars to 99.00%
3
posted on
09/22/2017 11:29:26 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: Boomer
Good!
Anyone that intentionally harms little kids, the mentally disabled or animals, and those teachers who seduce their students deserve the WORST to happen to them!
Sickos!
4
posted on
09/22/2017 11:30:05 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: LouAvul
5
posted on
09/22/2017 11:30:42 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: Boomer
A person that abuses animals can be expected to abuse humans.
They don’t have the empathy gene.
6
posted on
09/22/2017 11:30:47 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: Boomer
No, because the bar would be constantly being raised. Today, dogs and cats, in ten years chickens, pigs, cows.
7
posted on
09/22/2017 11:33:17 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Constantly doing things in opposition to human nature is insanity.)
To: Boomer
Fast-forward to the near future when speaking against pedophilia will be considered hate speech.
8
posted on
09/22/2017 11:33:17 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(https://imgoat.com/uploads/645920e395/39513.gif)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
I agree.
When I was raising my family I told them,when they were young children,to have NOTHING to do with any child who was mean to animals.
.
9
posted on
09/22/2017 11:33:53 AM PDT
by
Mears
To: Jeff Chandler
10
posted on
09/22/2017 11:34:09 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(https://imgoat.com/uploads/645920e395/39513.gif)
To: Boomer
Abattoir workers most affected.
To: Boomer
"I am 100% for this and increasing punishment/penalties for harming innocent animals on purpose." Who gets to define this? Perhaps PETA will say that killing cows, chickens, pigs, etc for food is "harming innocent animals on purpose." Applying "hate-type" penalties to harming animals intentionally slides us down a slope that a more progressive administration could use for their own benefit.
I don't like the idea of anyone intentionally harming my pets or others' pets or even abusing animals meant for slaughter, but I don't want to open the door that seems like a good idea now that might be used later to close down our rights.
Here's a seemingly outlandish example: PETA and others think that we aren't pet owners but are instead pet adopters. If we agreed with that and put a collar on our pets, is that abuse? You might not agree but the Powers-That-Be may just use it to charge you with intentional harm of an animal.
I don't know the future but I don't want to give the next progressive administration; federal, state, or local, an opening to make us feel like we have slipped into 1984.
12
posted on
09/22/2017 11:43:13 AM PDT
by
Purdue77
(I can't afford a tag line.)
To: I want the USA back
I stepped on a spider today . . . on purpose . . . where do I register?
13
posted on
09/22/2017 11:43:39 AM PDT
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Boomer
I understand people want to protect animals, and that abusing animals is a sign of something deeper being wrong with you... but I can only see this as more government, bigger government, more overreach, more authoritarian, etc.
14
posted on
09/22/2017 11:44:03 AM PDT
by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
To: Pilgrim's Progress
I brushed my teeth this morning, killing millions of bacteria.
Am I guilty, or are you sizeist?
15
posted on
09/22/2017 11:50:03 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Anitfa = Anti-F.A. = Anti-First Amendment)
To: Boomer
How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?
16
posted on
09/22/2017 11:51:49 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Boomer
How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?
17
posted on
09/22/2017 11:51:49 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Boomer
How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?
18
posted on
09/22/2017 11:51:51 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Boomer
I back this 100%. Anyone who willfully abuses animals should damned well have a social stigma attached to them.
19
posted on
09/22/2017 11:54:48 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
( Liberals, go find another country.)
To: Boomer
Good.
Anyone who can’t make a clear distinction between animals used for food (who *STILL* should not be subject to any more pain or stress than necessary) and others (be it a PETA member or someone whining about a slippery slope) is an idiot.
Personally, anyone inflicting pain on a dog or cat or parrot should be shot on the spot.
20
posted on
09/22/2017 11:57:40 AM PDT
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson