Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Perry's vision of hot tub-sized nuclear power plants isn't so far-fetched
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | John Siciliano

Posted on 10/09/2017 5:38:11 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: RoosterRedux

They work safely and well in submarines, under the control of 18-24 year old techs, supervised by 25-30 year old officers. Sounds like a workable system to me.


21 posted on 10/09/2017 6:42:55 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thorium.


22 posted on 10/09/2017 6:42:58 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Check out ‘HOLTEC’ in Camden NJ


23 posted on 10/09/2017 6:44:39 AM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Cool! Where can I get me one with auto-Chlorine, captains chairs, and 8 stainless steel jets?


24 posted on 10/09/2017 6:47:10 AM PDT by C210N (It is easier to fool the people than convince them that they have been fooled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

Thorium is such high temperature (molten salt, think about how hot that has to be) is already at thermal run away

I am all for thorium when it’s ready but material Science has a ways to go for a commercially sustainable reactor. We have decades of experience with uranium fission that could be leveraged right now.


25 posted on 10/09/2017 6:50:41 AM PDT by infool7 (Pray, Think, Pray, Act, Pray Pray Pray...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Where is that one?


26 posted on 10/09/2017 7:04:20 AM PDT by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Mostly not true.

The “thorium cycle” is actually a uranium cycle, just a different uranium isotope. Thorium is mostly Th-232 (non radioactive). Neutrons convert Th-232 into U-233, which IS fissile, and which CAN be made into bombs. It is just much more difficult to isolate the fissile uranium from the fertile thorium due to the much higher level or radiation involved. IIRC, U-233 is highly gamma radioactive. Plutonium is not.

Thorium is being sold as an energy panacea.....it isn’t.

(Note....I am all in favor of fission power, even using current technology, but believe in being accurate about what is possible.)


27 posted on 10/09/2017 7:07:45 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

“Nuclear electricity,” thats pretty silly. I think we all know better now but, how do we deal with all the giant ants and 50 foot women?


28 posted on 10/09/2017 7:18:52 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I assume it is still on the moon.


29 posted on 10/09/2017 7:21:33 AM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw
Track down every colony and "burn them, burn them all!"


30 posted on 10/09/2017 7:26:36 AM PDT by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Ah. The dust looked wind swept. It must have been close enough to the LEM take off to disturb the regolith.


31 posted on 10/09/2017 7:28:32 AM PDT by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

A small nuke reactor is a very good idea with just one down side. Terrorists, terrorists would just love to get their hands on the fuel and make some really nasty bombs. Should start using lots of small nuke reactors like the one described in this article terrorists will acquired fuel from some of them and results will not be pretty.


32 posted on 10/09/2017 7:42:05 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
They work safely and well in submarines, under the control of 18-24 year old techs, supervised by 25-30 year old officers. Sounds like a workable system to me.

It's only workable while under military guard.

The nuclear reactors in submarines use highly enriched (96% U-235) uranium. I.e. weapons grade. This is fine as long as it's under military guard, but is not something you could leave unguarded.

33 posted on 10/09/2017 7:46:13 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The nuclear reactors in submarines use highly enriched (96% U-235) uranium. I.e. weapons grade. This is fine as long as it's under military guard, but is not something you could leave unguarded.

I was talking about the concept of small reactors, not the specific type.

34 posted on 10/09/2017 8:01:47 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

You mean something like this?

https://atomicinsights.com/ml1-mobile-power-system-reactor-box/


35 posted on 10/09/2017 8:07:32 AM PDT by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The Moon is a harsh mistress.


36 posted on 10/09/2017 8:19:26 AM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
"there is a compay in Texas pioneering small reactors. Underground power, can power a small city for up to 20 years. For peanuts. Replace and Remove every 20 years. Great technology and would remove the grid from being a national issue."

Now you have a hot tub full of seething radioactivity - lethally radioactive for the next 50 to 100 human generations.

So what does one do with the radioactive trash? Have the taxpayers foot the bill for disposal?

If the **ratepayers** had to foot the bill for the entire fuel cycle, the only nuke plants that would exists would be military - for power or for weapons.

Until the multiple issues of how to safely dispose of the nuke trash is resolved, I have to be a non-supporter.
This, if for no other reason, than to *not* leave a mess behind for my grandkids......

37 posted on 10/09/2017 8:27:11 AM PDT by ASOC (If you're forced to give a man a fish, he eats one day. Deport him and you'll never feed him again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Indeed she is. You have to tow the (Hein)lein exactly to survive...


38 posted on 10/09/2017 9:23:51 AM PDT by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

doesn’t Voyager have one ? (small nuclear power generator)


39 posted on 10/09/2017 9:29:35 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I thought I had read somewhere that Sweden or one of those other places with remote mountain villages already has something like this?


40 posted on 10/09/2017 9:30:24 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson