Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There’s talk of capping 401(k) contributions at $2,400 per year
Market Watch ^ | October 20, 2017 | Anne Tergesen and Richard Rubin

Posted on 10/20/2017 9:58:58 AM PDT by C19fan

Proposals floating around Washington to cap the amount that Americans can contribute before taxes to 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts are unsettling professionals in the retirement industry.

Republicans are looking for ways to generate revenue to support broad reductions in individual tax rates. One idea is to limit the amount of pretax money households can sock away for retirement saving. Such a move would likely generate significant political blowback but it hasn’t been explicitly ruled out, stirring worry among industry lobbyists.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 401k; 401kcap; 401kcontributions; taxes; trumptaxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last
To: Grampa Dave
More fake news from these lying liberals pretending to be concerned about our financial concerns/futures.

Fake news indeed... Of course they do not mention just who has proposed this. The link shows a picture of two Republican representatives who happen to be on the Ways and Means Committee, but nothing in the article indicates they are the ones who floated the idea. They also mention that a spokeswoman for the Committee "declined to comment".

81 posted on 10/20/2017 10:40:40 AM PDT by NJRighty ("It's sick out there and getting sicker" - Bob Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

you are probably correct about that.

President Reagan did reduce taxes (somewhat, anyway.. it was party true)

so I am still a little bit hopeful

HOWEVER YES, given the RINOs in the Senate especially...
I guess you are right.... they’ll never ever reduce taxes substantially on the rest of us, never. They are basically left-wing or leftist-enablers


82 posted on 10/20/2017 10:40:54 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman
Not knowing what the tax situation will be years from now, I diversified into both Roth accounts and pre-tax accounts. My situation is I'm supporting a family of five so my tax liability isn't nearly as high as when I was single.
83 posted on 10/20/2017 10:41:36 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Thanks for posting this. I had forgotten this bs from the Clintoons!

Bad. But not nearly as bad as the trial balloon Bill Clinton floated shortly after being elected. His proposal was a one time “tax” on the current value of all 401 k’s and other private retirement accounts, (10% - 20% were the amounts floated)to shore up Social Security. He got so much blow back he quickly stated he never supported such a plan in the first place and, if I recall, the economist behind it was fired. But don’t think for a minute Washington wouldn’t LOVE to get a hold of all the private money that right now by law they can’t touch.


84 posted on 10/20/2017 10:41:44 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Trump is kicking their a$$es, they, ______________, want to quit. (Fill in the blank!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
currently put in over $30,000+ a year
I thought the personal limit on annual contributions to an IRA was $5.5K. How the heck are you getting to $30K?
85 posted on 10/20/2017 10:41:47 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

No one size fits all, unfortunately the tax code is too complicated. There are tools that can help such as Optimal Retirement Planner.

https://www.i-orp.com/delta/index.html


86 posted on 10/20/2017 10:42:00 AM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

I understand in general terms the differences, but I still don’t know why you would say a 401K is a “ripoff”. That doesn’t make sense to me at all. Can you explain why you say that?


87 posted on 10/20/2017 10:42:07 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
DON'T WE ALREADY GIVE THE FEDS ENOUGH MONEY??
88 posted on 10/20/2017 10:42:46 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I’ve worked for 17 companies, about half as a contractor. Of the half that was as a company employee, a little over half offered matching funds, but even then you had to put in 3-5 years to see any of it chipped in.

Again, I see 401k’s as a ripoff only if there are no matching funds. And then only because there are superior alternatives for “wage earners”. There are a lot of rundowns on the internet explaining this.

I’ve found that anything discussing investing or savings can be quite contentious on FR. There are a lot of opinions. Retirement vehicles are like motor vehicles. All have their detractors, but some of them REALLY deserve it.


89 posted on 10/20/2017 10:44:58 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

You do not want another civil war. Trump is working at it

WE must help


90 posted on 10/20/2017 10:44:58 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

LOL
I figured I was hearing “California Screaming,” and I was. Find someone else to subsidize your monstrous state tax.


91 posted on 10/20/2017 10:45:01 AM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman
Go Roth IRA

I agree with you. I'd be amazed if the feds don't mess with it.

92 posted on 10/20/2017 10:45:17 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Funny they just raised limits for next year to $18,500, catch up stayed at $6,000.


93 posted on 10/20/2017 10:47:53 AM PDT by edhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Required minimum distributions begin at age 70 1/2 for 401Ks and IRAs. The government will let you defer taxes but not forever.


94 posted on 10/20/2017 10:48:14 AM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
I'm with you. I'm retired, and the last thing I want is more taxable income. If I stay below a certain threshold, there are some tax advantages (federal and county/state/local) for Seniors.

If the taxes on retirement savings aren't paid ahead of time, you're at the mercy of the taxman for any new laws that are enacted.

95 posted on 10/20/2017 10:50:17 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Morons.

All this will do is shift anything >$2400/y over to Roth IRA's. In other words, it just kicks the can down the road when the revenue will be lost on withdrawal.

96 posted on 10/20/2017 10:53:30 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“The Stupid Party” for a reason.


97 posted on 10/20/2017 10:53:42 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The "God Gene" is evolution's way of saying "Chaos Sucks!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Please show me an IRA that will let a 50 year old worker exclude $24k from taxable income like a 401(k) allows. Sounds like your broker can sell IRAs but doesn’t have any 401(k) business. You can also out that entire $24k into Roth. Again show me an IRA you can dump that much in each year.


98 posted on 10/20/2017 10:54:50 AM PDT by edhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Yep... the challenge can be that the retiree may have a 7 digit value of retirement funds, and it can ALL be taxable. What you put in over the years is taxable, the income it made is taxable, the company contributions if it is in one or more 401ks are taxable. It can be a LARGE looming tax burden.

Now I agree if you want to take out 15K a year, the tax burden is not so bad. But say you want to pay cash for a new car, or travel, or gift to your kids or whatever.... the money you pull is taxable. Say you have to pay for medical costs that your lousy Obama regulated insurance company won't pay for... it's taxable. Furthermore, at some point you get old enough that the RMD is more than 15k. They will get their money.

99 posted on 10/20/2017 10:55:35 AM PDT by kjam22 (America need forgiveness from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: edhawk

Well, if you are doing that I’d put all I can in the Roth first and then top off my contributions to the 401k. And since the employee contribution limit on 401k’s is 18k, I assume you are adding in your company’s matching funds to get to the 24k.

Man, I’m 64 and I worked hard to ensure that I just won’t need much money when I’m 66. It’s all in paid off real estate and PM’s.

I guess I took that “going Galt” thing a bit too serious. :)


100 posted on 10/20/2017 10:59:33 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson