Posted on 10/20/2017 5:45:35 PM PDT by Cheerio
She was one of the NeverTrumper’s in that infamous National Review issue of all the known Republican NeverTrumpers
That was a MAJOR F*CK UP on her part.... It makes me question her discernment and think she is fraud Thus, proceed with caution when it comes with Dana. Personally I would never trust her.
Although I do enjoy listening to her, she makes great points and she is good looking woman. On the individual gun issues she’s always good.
Although I still can’t understand how she could not understand President Trump? How can she not see that makes me not trust her. Don’t ever elect her to a position of trust because either she lacks critical thinking or B more likely she is fraud.
Pro-Cruz NeverTrumpers were at least loyal to a specific person — i.e., Ted Cruz — and to conservative ideology. Many of them, for example, Cal Thomas — I think — came around once Trump won the nomination. Those types of “Never Trumpers” I consider to be “Not Yet Trumpers”, and I admire their willingness to change their minds. Bill Kristol, on the other hand, is just a stubborn snob.
Fantastic video, and reading the angry replies on twitter is truly nourishing for the soul. I’m warm, tingling and awash in Schadenfreude almost as good as the day after the election.
I think she’s always been a Never Trumper who works for Glenn Beck, so a little nuts?
Love the ad...need more like it!
The left doesn’t even seem to know the meaning of the word “fascism”, but they never flinch from using it to slime president Trump.
According to the man in this video, Trump has not spoken to the NRA. Be aware. Beware.
Republican Turncoats Introduce Anti-Gun Law!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCLoIorYguU
So would you call her an opportunist? Did she oppose Trump in the general election? If so, how sincere is her pro-Gun shtick?
Well, for sure Trump brought out the worst in John McCain.But Trump has delivered judicious judicial nominees, and on that basis alone he is the heavyweight champ. No guarantee that any of the other candidates for the Republican nomination could have won. Cruz in particular - whom I did favor, and contribute to - claimed that he would beat Hillary in debate. Well, maybe - but that would not be enough, as we saw when Trump did it.
When Trump had to cancel a Chicago rally because of
demonstrationsrioters Cruz properly condemned the rioters. But because Trump had insulted Cruz’ father, Cruz committed an unforced error by proceeding in the same paragraph to criticize Trump. I was appalled, because in context nothing else mattered but censuring that violation of the “right of the people peaceably to assemble.” And I pretty well knew that at that moment Cruz was close to being cooked.I guess you could say that Trump has prospered by bringing out the worst in his opponents.
yes-at that time they supported Cruz.
The one thing that everyone must admit is that Trump is a lightening rod. That includes conservative, liberal, democrat, Republican, eastablishment or otherwise. No one is able to feel luke warm about him. In the case of Cruz, I might have taken great offense myself if he accused my father of killing Kennedy. I suspect that Cruz is one of the few in Washington that Trump really trusts. The two people the Washington establishment hated and feared the most were Trump and Cruz. Their paths will cross again.
People can be pro-Cruz and not support candidate Trump because of his stand on issues and not be a never Trumper.
Far to often the Trump fan club paints with a brush that is very broad.
Thanks.
I miss Chuck Heston. He was the best NRA president ever.
If he were still alive and healthy he would l be leading the charge for the NRA and DJT.
Dana does tell it like it is though she pulls her punches a little bit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.