Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I found this article funny! I guess the Dictator of North Korea has realized that Russia is very mad at him; that China is very mad at him; and clearly South Korea and Japan would be mad at him.

I do not know for sure the other two parties would be, but I assume it would be South Korea and Japan.

Maybe Las Vegas quoted 5-1 odds against him versus 1-1 odds if he goes head to head with US.

In other words, he has made so many people mad at him, he figures reduces the number of enemies (from 5) to 1 is his best hope.

LOL! Just LOL!

1 posted on 10/22/2017 7:47:05 AM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: topher

I actually agree, somewhat with NK. The other countries at the table bring nothing (unless one is South Korea). From the NK perspective I can’t see any benefit to talking to anybody but us.

The problem is that the NK is nothing but a pack of liars and there is no point in discussing anything with them when experience has shown us that their word and written agreements are worthless.


2 posted on 10/22/2017 7:55:17 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

This is simple to explain to even the most brain-dead of Liberals. See the Kims have always wanted one on one talks with the U.S. because the Cult of Kim sees itself as a World (now Nuclear) Power and never got over the fact that the U.S. during the Korean War saved the South and drove them out!

They have been demanding Single Party Talks for years because they want to be treated like the old USSR.


3 posted on 10/22/2017 7:56:01 AM PDT by Trueblackman (Who knew Trump would cause tthis level of derangement among the Socialists, Liberals & Establements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

We need to send a Lieutenant Colonel or Commander over there to explain “MIRV” and other technical terms to his leadership group.


4 posted on 10/22/2017 7:56:33 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

Until, the NorKs put the Moe Howard look alike up against the wall and change their policy, the US should not have any talks with them.
I would consider an exchange, of Un for all of our liberals.


9 posted on 10/22/2017 8:26:02 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

They are signalling a willingness to talk. Even a desire and a need to talk. This can only be a good sign. They’ve gone from we’re gonna nuke Guam to we’re not going back to 6 party talks in less than a month. Keep up the pressure and increase the rhetoric and sanctions


10 posted on 10/22/2017 8:27:06 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

Mr. Trump is too nice. <<< that’s period back there!
;)
***


12 posted on 10/22/2017 9:00:19 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

Pissonnk. Tell them if they wish, we will nuke the whole damn country back into the Stone Age and embargo ALL imports from China. The Chinese aren’t helping the situation one bit. Under the table, they are supporting and encouraging rocket man to give the US a poke in the eye.

Talking never hurt anyone, so let’s tell them...see what happens.


13 posted on 10/22/2017 9:03:00 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

US President Honey Badger don’t care.


14 posted on 10/22/2017 9:14:52 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher

To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war. ~ Winston Churchill

Always? Maybe.


16 posted on 10/22/2017 9:25:16 AM PDT by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: topher
This may be a reference to the P5+1 talks.

In 2006, Iran started talks with P5+1 group.

In that case, it was five permanent UN Security Members plus Iran.

So this would be the five permanent UN Security Members plus North Korea.

21 posted on 10/25/2017 5:48:21 PM PDT by topher (America, please Do The Right Thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson