Posted on 12/01/2017 7:35:32 AM PST by blam
Despite losing the 2016 election largely because the Democrat Party refused to move away from divisive identity based politics they have apparently not learned their lesson, with at least one powerful female Democrat deciding to piggyback off the wave of sexual assault allegations sweeping the country by openly telling Michigan voters to vote for her because she is a women.
Democratic candidate for Michigan’s Attorney General, Dana Nessel, has released an ad for her campaign that directly implies that voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis and therefore cannot sexually assault someone she works with like many male politicians (on both sides of the aisle) have been accused of over the past month.
“Who can you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting? That would be the candidate who doesn’t have one,” Nessel says with a straight face as headlines of male sexual harassment play across the screen.
Nessel attempted to explain the fact that she is now attempting to guilt voters into voting for her as a way to show that they are against sexual harassment in an interview with a local news outlet.
“If you get more women in office, if you get more women in positions of authority, you’re less likely to have issues where someone is pulling out their penis at an inappropriate time in the the workplace,” she told WWJ’s Charlie Langton.
(snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at shtfplan.com ...
You think all this craziness by Democrats isn't helping Republicans?
Idiots. What next? Not to vote for an American?
I'm gonna have to see some documentation on this. I don't much trust democrats or liberal lesbians.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Well, they already did THAT....
Probably.
We will see more of this as they continue to slide down hill.
Back in college 30 years ago female students were being forced into lesbian sex by the women’s lib professors. It’s worse now. Maybe they didn’t have penises (emphasis on maybe) but they still got the harassment job done.
What a dilemma for these whackos. Whatever will they do to swell the tide of 'chiks with diks' in their ranks. Short arm inspections to register ?
Please tell me how and I will encourage it all the more.
It’s okay that women are constantly showing their TITS in public.
The issue is never the issue.
The issue is ALWAYS the revolution.
~ MM ~
Plus, they aren't using the reasoning portion of their brains and as a result they don't have as many people on their side as they think they have.
voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis
What does she have to say about the Millions of females that wore their pussies on their heads for the whole world to see?? If that isn’t Sexual harassment on a grand scale by an entire sex, what is??
I bet those hands can grab a dildo and hit someone over the head with it. That qualifies as sexual assault, doesn't it?
But it is okay for a woman to wear skin tight clothes that leave little to the imagination?
Predicated on the notion that it is impossible for women to commit sexual harassment. The ad starts from a false premise.
“If you get more women in office, if you get more women in positions of authority, you’re less likely to have issues where someone is pulling out their penis at an inappropriate time in the the workplace,”
She will just pull out her strap on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.