Women be trippin’
The SJW madness currently gripping the culture is the logical result of YEARS of indoctrination by the Left, yet many old guard Liberals act SURPRISED when their Frankensteins’ end up destroying their creators...
Pussplaining.
Look up the root of hysteria.
MGTOW
It’s really more like (in my case) a male theater person explaining to me (a theater female) about theater - basically assuming I know nothing. It is annoying BUT: that’s all it is. And any smart woman can come back with a snappy putdown instead of sniffling into her cornflakes and wearing a stupid pink hat.
There are some great youtube videos of feminists getting owned. The best way to really get to them is to basically have fun with what they say. i.e. laugh at it. :)
Of course, you have to be ready to explain why it’s so funny. And the answer is that they no longer have anything to complain about. They got what they wanted. Their cause is no more. They are a political vestigial organ.
Women are always right.
Men are always wrong.
This has been a “fact” since the rise of feminism.
Time for it to stop. Women don’t get to win 100% of the arguments.
Surprise, surprise, surprise -- this results in women being used and treated like disposable sex objects, and many of them don't like it.
Here's a clue: if the results stink, maybe the premises are wrong. Maybe men and women aren't alike "except for plumbing". Maybe our sexual behavior evolved, not to amuse us, but to propagate the species, and maybe propagating the species places profoundly different demands on women and men. Maybe that means that men and women have a very different approach to, and understanding of, sex.
And this should be blatantly obvious to anyone with an ounce of brains, but the feminist ideologues who rule our culture and especially our universities don't have even that.
How about this: Save the tweets and the texts. If a crime has been committed, it should be reported to police.
Social media is turning America into a Junior High School.
more like “b**chsplaining”
A very good response to this story is by Matt Walsh and is titled, “You Feel Violated After Casual Sex Because You Degraded Yourself. Not Because It Was Rape.”
It’s at a site that for some reason isn’t welcome here on FR.
Here’s some of it:
The #MeToo crusaders do seem to have picked up on one important truth. They have gone in entirely the wrong direction with it, and learned all the wrong lessons from it, but they are right, at least, about this: there is something wrong with the way we approach sex in modern society, and it’s leaving a lot of people feeling hurt and abused.
But, beholden always to their narrative, they read a story like Grace’s and automatically interpret it as a struggle between an innocent woman and a depraved rapist of a man. When they hear that Grace felt violated after the fact, they declare that it must have been her “consent” that was violated. After all, the only thing either participant is required to respect is consent. It’s the only rule. The One Commandment. The only thing that can be violated. There are, in the modern mind, only two types of sex: consensual and rape. Whatever falls under the first umbrella must be good. So if a woman feels not-good the next morning, it must have been the not-good type, which means it must have been rape.
But the effort to fit begrudging yet consensual sex into the rape category requires the formation of a bunch of new and confusing and constantly changing rules. The overly simplified “good or rape” formula suddenly turns into an overly complicated calculus, and the only way for a man to really know whether he has committed rape or not is to ask his partner the next day. And even then, she may not make the determination until the following week, or next month after she sees you on TV winning a Golden Globe. And suddenly we have fixed the problem of sex in modern society by turning it into a criminal act. Ironically, conservatives are always accused of wanting to criminalize promiscuity but liberals have actually done it.
Their narratives and formulas have blinded them. They don’t understand that a person can be consensually violated during sex. A woman can unmistakably communicate consent — say, by getting naked in a strange man’s living room and grabbing his genitals — but still wind up feeling degraded and abused by the end of it because her dignity was violated. They don’t understand this concept because they don’t understand that human beings have inherent dignity to begin with. It’s like trying to diagnose a heart condition while denying the existence of the heart.
Here is the reality: Sex that consensually violates the dignity of a person is immoral and harmful, but legal and reciprocal. Casual sex — sex between strangers who just met on Tinder or at a party — is a mutual violation of human dignity. Both partners reduce the other to mere flesh and bone; a set of body parts with no soul or purpose other than to be used as a glorified masturbatory device. This is the essence of casual sex. It’s what makes it casual. And it’s why you have that icky feeling the next morning.
At the root of it, feminists don't explain anything, they just bitch and moan.
I don't think that day can come too soon.
” gave her white wine instead of red”
OMG. This man should be put in stocks and flailed with a cat ‘o nine tails.
Get married. Stay faithful. Honor each other. Avoid all of this PC drama.
That is to say, "Just don't fornicate."
Femsplaining it’s shorter.
Lady I had known for a long time, 40 years or so, invited me to a pool party this summer. Got there and there were about 30 of her close friends there. Girlfriends and husbands mostly. Very loyal and protective of her.
Anyway. So it got later, everyone left. I kissed her goodnight. Very, very, very good kiss. We ended up having sex. Very, very, very good sex. If I do say so myself. And I promise. It was not just one sided.
So she tells one of her friends. And she tells one. And she tells one. Etc. Next thing I know they are mad at me. She gets mad at herself. And me. And now I got a lot of chicks in this small town mad at me for “taking advantage” of their friend. Heck. We are both in our mid-50’s. Just Damn.
3 times in the past month Mrs TalBlack started to explain something to me in the most idiotically condescending I’m-trying-to-be-patient-tone, to which I reacted viscerally with “Knock that OFF”!! as if I were talking to some kid. It’s so out of place that I wonder WTF? TV attitudes creeping into real life or what?