Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Interesting they have Very Positive, Somewhat Positive, and Negative breakouts. Why not Somewhat Negative and Very Negative? I’m guessing that would make the Negative numbers looks too small.


3 posted on 01/31/2018 11:32:49 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CatOwner
Interesting they have Very Positive, Somewhat Positive, and Negative breakouts. Why not Somewhat Negative and Very Negative? I’m guessing that would make the Negative numbers looks too small.

You are exactly right. Somewhat negative is 16% and very negative is 13%. This is using stats to lie by deliberate omission.

Link to poll results

Controlling for the nonstop hammering in the press versus the nonstop slobbering over Obama in past SOTUs, President Trump hit an out-of-the-park grand slam.

7 posted on 01/31/2018 12:28:20 PM PST by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner
Probably because most of the "somewhat positive" wanted to reply "very positive" but feared being called racist.

A 70% positive total would destroy the whole CNN meme.

11 posted on 01/31/2018 2:45:53 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson