Skip to comments.
Dem Rep. Quigley: "Out Of Context" That McCabe Said No FISA Warrant Without Dossier
RCP Video ^
| 2-5-2018
| Ian Schwartz
Posted on 02/05/2018 2:33:51 PM PST by Sir Napsalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Sir Napsalot
If the dossier was accurate then why did the FBI cut Steele loose and refuse to pay him?
21
posted on
02/05/2018 2:56:22 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: Sir Napsalot
If the dossier is “largely accurate”, WHAT ARE THEY FREAKIN CRYING ABOUT????
22
posted on
02/05/2018 2:58:50 PM PST
by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: Sir Napsalot
When asked if then-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe told the Intel Committee behind closed doors that if not for the Steele dossier no FISA warrant would have been issued, he said that was taken "out of context" and that those were "not his exact words." He called the dossier "largely accurate." Release the transcript of the relevant part of McCabe's testimony and settle it once and for all.
To: Sir Napsalot
When ANY Democrat talks, I just assume he’s LYING! It’s what they do!!
24
posted on
02/05/2018 3:05:20 PM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: NTHockey
The Democrats are skillfully avoiding your point. But we are not being fooled. A large percentage of the voting crowd might be but not us.
25
posted on
02/05/2018 3:05:43 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: Sir Napsalot
Great. Let’s release the transcripts.
To: Sir Napsalot
Trumpmas: where all the DC cherry trees are decorated with your favorite lying Demoscum....
27
posted on
02/05/2018 3:07:50 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Wonder if he is involved in any Demoscum pedo rings?
28
posted on
02/05/2018 3:08:22 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
To: Sir Napsalot
The DEMONRATS have started their campaign of lies to cover for the Deep State traitors. A pox on them all.
29
posted on
02/05/2018 3:09:30 PM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(The GOP-Democrat-Media Uniparty must be destroyed.)
To: Sir Napsalot
The answer to this is more transparency.
Let us see the transcripts!
30
posted on
02/05/2018 3:09:32 PM PST
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: Col Frank Slade
Probably off the record like Hillary’s questioning
31
posted on
02/05/2018 3:11:59 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
If they had verified intelligence, why did they use a Yahoo News story to support the dossier? Why did they use the dossier at all, knowing that it was Clinton campaign opposition research?
And if they are concerned about revealing sources and methods, shouldn’t they be concerned that a former British spy had co-opted their sources and methods?
.
.
They’re liars.
The dossier was used and Yahoo article because whatever so-called evidence they had was meager at best.
This is a FISA warrant and has a higher (supposedly) standard for granted a warrant.
To: NTHockey
Exactly. They are doing this to deflect attention from the gorilla.
To: Sir Napsalot
you can’t have a ‘largely accurate’ document without credible sources that can be examined and verified.
Steele is not a source. He’s a gossip. The sources are the original sources of information, who are nowhere to be found, much less identified and examined and verified.
34
posted on
02/05/2018 3:16:42 PM PST
by
blueplum
( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
To: Sir Napsalot
Then release the transcripts and let us be the judge.
35
posted on
02/05/2018 3:17:50 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(A year in Arizona... and I haven't burst into flames yet.)
To: odawg
Pathetic lie, closely akin to I cant comment on that due to an ongoing investigation. The expert.....
Bill here didn't anything wrong
but I am opening an investigation and
I don't comment on open investigations.
36
posted on
02/05/2018 3:18:03 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
To: Fhios
McCabe was either saying:
1) The FBI wouldn’t have submitted the FISA application if it hadn’t been for the dossier, or
2) The FISC wouldn’t have approved the warrant without the dossier.
And that improves their argument how?
37
posted on
02/05/2018 3:20:17 PM PST
by
Beach333
To: Beach333
Just in: House Intelligence panel votes to release Democrats’ rebuttal of Nunes memo
To: gibsonguy
Fake but largely accurate.
39
posted on
02/05/2018 3:22:00 PM PST
by
samtheman
(We dont need no stinking summaries. Release unedited FISA documents.)
To: janetjanet998
They have to give Moonbat Nation something.
The butthurt on the left is strong.
40
posted on
02/05/2018 3:23:04 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson