Whether she was a Trump appointee or not, she has to be swamp, based the reason she gave for resigning.
Allowing herself to be quoted as saying the DOJ has been under attack from President Trump reveals a lot about where her loyalties are (and are not).
When a POTUS expresses disapproval of or takes disciplinary action toward specific elements within a department under his administration, it is not called “attacking”, it is called “presiding”.
Characterizing it as an attack on the agency is a lie, and it’s a lie only someone hostile to the President’s agenda would tell.
There were no quotes from Rachel Brand in the article. That was 100% the New York Times’ spin. The two anonymous sources mentioned in the article only confirmed that she was leaving.
What was the reason she gave for resigning? Where do you see any such quote from her about the president attacking the DOJ?