Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Nunes attacks the Constitution when he tries to smear Mueller’s Russia probe
Vallejo Times-Herald ^ | February 11, 2018 | Erwin Chemerinsky

Posted on 02/11/2018 8:47:23 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom

It is increasingly clear that President Donald Trump and the Republicans are engaging in a campaign to smear and discredit special prosecutor Robert Mueller. All of this is an effort to undermine an investigation into whether serious federal crimes occurred that potentially implicate individuals at the highest levels of the government, including Trump and members of his family.

The need for an independent criminal investigation is clear. Was there illegal collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russians? Has there been a cover-up that constitutes obstruction of justice? If so, who is responsible?

Contrary to the president’s assertion, this is not a partisan “witch hunt.” Already two individuals have plead guilty to federal crimes. George Papadopoulos plead guilty to lying to the FBI about his efforts, while a Trump campaign official, to set up meetings with Kremlin-connected sources who claimed to have damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn plead guilty to “willfully and knowingly” making “false, fictitious and fraudulent statements” to the FBI about communications exchanged with a Russian envoy shortly after Trump took office.

Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign manager for a time, and Rick Gates, his aide, have been indicted for the crime of “conspiracy against the United States.” They have been charged with operating as agents of foreign governments without registering as required by the law and laundering over $75 million in offshore accounts.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesheraldonline.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: liberalidiot; usefulidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: ProtectOurFreedom

Yoga logic


21 posted on 02/11/2018 9:09:35 AM PST by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Give thanks again for our founders who had enough to create this Constitution. It is only except for Trump and protect and keeps this Marxist for getting held of this nation.


22 posted on 02/11/2018 9:09:42 AM PST by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Truth and facts be damned. The first sentence is all one needs to read to know this is just another BS hit piece on President Trump.


23 posted on 02/11/2018 9:10:11 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

People keep telling me that LSD is not legal. I offer exhibit A as a rebuttal.


24 posted on 02/11/2018 9:13:20 AM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Erwin is as ugly inside as he is outside. Good friend of Hugh Hewitt’s!


25 posted on 02/11/2018 9:15:30 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

When libs bring up the constitution, I can’t help but LMAO. How often did we hear them say that Obama should have absolute dictatorial power?


26 posted on 02/11/2018 9:15:54 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
It is hard to imagine any other context in which Chemerinsky, a liberal law professor and civil rights advocate, would endorse endless criminal investigation of an individual target when reasonable suspicion of a crime has been refuted and the target and his associates were the victims of a program of massive illegal eavesdropping.

Indeed, if Chemerinsky is correct in his reasoning, then J. Edgar Hoover is owed rehabilitation for his investigation of Martin Luther King. Obviously, by Chemerinsky's logic, King merited relentless investigation because he was echoing Communist propaganda and had Communist support and associates with Communist loyalties.

27 posted on 02/11/2018 9:16:05 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

They don’t believe it themselves, but they also believe that if they say it enough it might come true.


28 posted on 02/11/2018 9:17:21 AM PST by clintonh8r (Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Rather than let this investigation go forward

No one is stopping Muller. This is BS, as usual.

29 posted on 02/11/2018 9:18:20 AM PST by NutsOnYew (If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Chemerinsky was part of “the smart guys” segment on Hugh Hewitt’s show when I used to listen. Don’t listen any more. Erwin was always the antagonist, no matter the subject. His reasoning is so convoluted, he can look at any color and say it is the exact opposite. A rabid liberal to the nth degree.


30 posted on 02/11/2018 9:19:01 AM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

It seems to me I remember the Dems - with a lot of help from the media - trying to smear and discredit special prosecutor Kenneth Starr.


31 posted on 02/11/2018 9:20:28 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
"They still want to prosecute those who tell of Stalin’s horrors."

Liberal professors have washed that era down the memory hole. Most people under 30 probably don't even know about it, or have a very vague notion, at best. Just like the widespread violence of the 60s-70s New Left has mostly been forgotten.
32 posted on 02/11/2018 9:22:55 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

If Papadopoulos lied to the FBI, I don’t understand why he did so. If you read his guilty plea admission, the allegation is that he tried to set up contacts with people in Russia who had opposition research on Clinton. That’s it. That’s all he did. That’s not a crime. So why would he lie about it?

Something’s not right with the Papadopoulos involvement. He also hasn’t been sentenced yet even though he entered his guilty plea many months ago.


33 posted on 02/11/2018 9:27:08 AM PST by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
"Chemerinsky"

Hmmm, sounds Russian! He's obviously a treasonous tool of the Kremlin, hired to discredit our president, stifle his agenda, undermine confidence in our elections, bring government to a standstill, and bring general chaos and turmoil to our democratic process. Actually, that makes more sense than the case against Trump!
34 posted on 02/11/2018 9:27:25 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Apparently, the author is unaware that Congress is mentioned specifically in the Constitution. The FBI isn't, nor is there any mention of Special Prosecutors.

I'm more worried about misconduct by people we don't get to elect than by the ones we do.

35 posted on 02/11/2018 9:27:48 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ceebass

McCarthy is coming around.

His last article about this ended with these 3 words.

“I was wrong”


36 posted on 02/11/2018 9:29:35 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Breathtaking liberal denial of reality. They STILL believe in Russia, Russia, Russia and ignore the illegal effort to install Clinton and later overthrow Trump.

It is breathtaking the level of lying that they are doing.

Big Media wears no close. And they should be embarrassed.

37 posted on 02/11/2018 9:30:03 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KyCats
"That’s not a crime. So why would he lie about it?"

Given the Russia frenzy that was current at the time (and which lingers on), he might have thought that he needed to cover up even legal contact with Russia, since divulging ANY contact would be used by the enemies of Trump and would trigger cries of "collusion". This guy was not a seasoned veteran of politics.
38 posted on 02/11/2018 9:31:38 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

A more Russian, communist sounding name than Erwin chemerinsky would be difficult to come up with.


39 posted on 02/11/2018 9:32:20 AM PST by Newtoidaho (Proud member of Trump's army of online trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

He needs to recite the Independent Counsel clause of the Constitution so we can fully understand.


40 posted on 02/11/2018 9:32:36 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson