I can’t believe this is even controversial on this web site.
If you are denied a job because you don’t want to support a union, then you don’t have a right to take a job for which you are qualified. “Right to work” restores that.
Right to work is a name put on a product. It isn’t a right either. You have the privilege of denying forced entry into a union. So it is just another use of a word. It is not a right.
Rights, in my mind, automatically interject the thought of God given. It is a phrase used to make the topic seem more correct or incorrect by it’s use. You want to make something into a mountain from a molehill? Call it a right. Then for no legitimate reason it becomes more than an issue. By adding the word it becomes imperative. It’s a way to fool the reader or listener.
rwood