For California liberals, states’ rights are cool when it comes to defying federal law enforcement on illegal immigrants.
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
Principles ever changing with the issue. federal supremacy on some then states’ rights on others
I need Dramamine
California is basically in the modern version of a pro-slavery position. Immigrants are de facto slaves, but better since they are paid for mostly by other people.
There are only a few things the feds should be doing and border control and national security are two of them. And enforcing lets say a travel ban is a POTUS constitutional right.
Read less....
If the Constitution was actually followed (10th amendment) just about all federal law would be erased.
George Wallace was a politician but he was also quite liberal in most ways. He actually even supported integration at least when he first ran.
The one area he was really conservative, is I think he really did believe in state’s rights.
Second rule of holes: When your enemy is digging himself deeper, don’t interrupt him!
National defense and immigration are two areas in which the Federal Government legally does control.
Translation: It's OK if we do it. Moonbeam is the Angela Merkel wannabe of the American continent.
The Alioto’s have exposed themselves as some of the dumbest stumps in the forest since their parent’s generation left the political stage in SF.
The only one dumber then this brainless twit is Angela Alioto.
“I think there are interests at the local level that override the minutiae of the differences” in the law.
Why is this person an “Officer of the Court”?? he obviously knows nothing about the Constitution or the Law, shouldn’t he be under investigation by the BAR association and disbarred for not having the slightest clue as to how our laws work in this country??
Why is a person like this ALLOWED to be an “Officer of the Court”??
Bull Connor Brown. Hero of the Democrats.