Skip to comments.What Conservative Women Can Learn About Liberals From the Way They Treat Dana Loesch
Posted on 03/10/2018 5:31:38 AM PST by Kaslin
I have known Dana Loesch for a long time and I’ve been pleased to see her work her way up the food chain on the Right. She didn’t get to where she is because of a publicity stunt, because her whole gig is to offend people or because she mindlessly shills for the Republican Party. Instead, she’s someone with talent who was out there working her butt off for years.
Is Dana Loesch a mainstream grassroots conservative? Absolutely. Is she someone who should be considered a feminist role model? You bet. Having met her and her husband on numerous occasions, I can tell you that they seem to be a great couple with a great marriage; they’ve got kids; she’s topped the 20 hottest conservative women in the new media AND she’s respected for her mind. On top of that, Dana has had a successful career. That’s probably as close to the “You can have it all” feminist ideal as you can get.
That is why the liberal reaction to Dana Loesch since she became one of the most prominent women on the Right by becoming an NRA spokeswoman has been so fascinating. Granted, Dana does occasionally say something controversial, but that’s not a regular thing for her. She’s not a fascist, a white supremacist or even mean-spirited. She doesn’t advocate gun violence or school shootings. In fact, as a general rule, Dana spends the vast majority of her time expressing mainstream conservative beliefs.
That’s what makes the insane level of abuse she receives from the Left stand out so much. Just to give you an example of what I mean, these are just some of the comments she shared on her Twitter timeline in the last 24 hours and they are very typical:
Islandtime: @POTUSbonespur "Wouldn't it be sad is @DLoesch's children were the victims of gun violence. Thoughts and prayers..."
Larry: @seffrtnow "Not only are you a terrorist you are a Despicable loathsome vial scumbag who advocates for Mass school shootings for money shame on you you piece of crap @DLoesch"
irreverentmama: @irreverentmama "You're a whore for the NRA."
Jim Cornette @TheJimCornette "OK, Doll, you're quoting that terrorist @NRA c*nt on my Twitter now? Sorry, bye."
Dar Dixon @dardixon1 "@DLoesch it’s unproductive, disingenuous & non resourceful to claim that you’re anything but a WHORE for the @NRA $$$"
Tim Kassen @tkassen "Also, you are a liar. Your children will hate having to defend you once they are outside of your bubble"
Of course the habitual, vile, sexist abuse from liberals on Twitter is just the tip of the iceberg where Dana is concerned.
National Rifle Association spokeswoman Dana Loesch announced Sunday on Twitter that her family had been forced to move suddenly after she received multiple death threats from gun control advocates.
(From Dana) One guy hunted down my private cell phone number, called when police were here, threatened to shoot me in my front yard. #MeToo…. Another guy created a string of social media accounts, posted photos of my house, threatened to rape me to death. #MeToo…. Another gun control advocate, after threatening to hunt me down and assault me, dragged my kids into it. #MeToo…. I’ve only ever discussed these issues kinda vaguely. More I can’t discuss. I and other 2A women are sexually threatened regularly #MeToo
Maybe it’s just me, but don’t liberals INCESSANTLY complain about the sexual mistreatment of women and shame the men responsible (along with every other man they can find?) Yet, while that’s happening, presumably liberal men have been threatening to rape Dana and murder her children. What do you think the reaction of liberals would be if they found out Rachel Maddow or Michelle Obama had to move for their safety after getting those kind of messages? It would be on the front page of every paper in America and there would be Twitter hashtags for days. So why are the vast majority of liberals indifferent to rape and death threats as long as they’re aimed at someone like Dana?
It reminds me of something Michelle Malkin (who was also harassed until she had to move) told me back in 2008 when she was talking about the similar river of abuse she received from liberals, "There are a lot of double standards, and in particular, that conservative women just aren’t seen in some ways as human beings."
There is the ugly truth about what liberals believe.
If you don’t want liberal men threatening to rape you and hurt your children, then be a liberal. If not, don’t complain because you deserve it. Not every liberal thinks that way, but most of them do. In fact, I would suggest to you that the very reason Dana Loesch receives so much abuse is not because she’s different from other conservative women somehow, but because she is like other conservative women, but more prominent, and they like the idea of making an example of her.
What liberals hope is that other conservative women will look at the rape threats, the attacks on her family and the abuse Dana endures daily and go, “I better keep my mouth shut because I don’t want that to happen to me.” You see, if they can make conservative women AFRAID to speak up, they win by default.
Liberalism is no longer about winning arguments. It’s about intimidating people into silence. Shutting people up. De-platforming them. Doing whatever it takes to make sure that only the liberal opinion is considered because liberalism can’t win in a fair fight of ideas. So, liberal colleges allow students to storm the stage or riot to shut up conservative speakers. Social media platforms are finding ways to shut up conservatives. Organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center get paid to falsely brand conservative groups as hate groups. Newspaper and networks other than Fox primarily run squishes and liberals masquerading as people on the Right as their “conservative” voices. Conservatives are treated as pariahs in Hollywood and in schools. Political correctness, cries of “racism” and setting up “safe spaces” are today PRIMARILY about shutting down debates that liberals would rather not have. Along those same lines, going after the children of conservative women, abusing those women and threatening them with rape fits right in with everything else liberals are doing.
The only thing I can tell conservative women (and men for that matter) is for the sake of your children and the sake of your country, don’t ever let them silence you or shut up the people who are saying what you believe. The moment you stop talking about what you believe is the moment the bad guys win and America loses.
Liberals really can’t take a moral position on anything. They are just sleazy people who want power over others. They sometimes talk about “the high ground” and they act “holier than thou” but any claim they make to moral superiority should be laughed at. They are all despicable, hateful people.
Dana has my thanks and admiration for standing up for conservatism. May God keep her and her family safe.
Gun control advocates threatening to shoot people to death.
To appease the liberals you have to be willing to sacrifice your child at the altar of Baal.
Very well said.
Gun control advocates are the ones that are evil.
‘They sometimes talk about the high ground and they act holier than thou
your point is absolutely true; but I’d ask you keep in mind some gratuitous slams have been posted on this very forum regarding Obama’s family, so moral high grounds can be illusory indeed...
Liberals are totalitarian thugs.
I won’t be intimidated or silence by them. I know who I am and I know my values.
I don’t have to threaten, shout down or brow beat others to know they stand the test of time. They speak for themselves.
When liberals have a problem with the Silent Majority, in reallty, they have a problem with themselves.
And none of what they do is going to shame, shut up or marginalize conservatives or take America from us,
We’re just getting started with our pushback against leftist fascism and you liberals consider yourselves placed on notice.
I wonder if Dana has changed her Never Trump stance.
So...you know my sister-in-law and her husband.
“Having met her and her husband...”
Now we’re getting to the rut of the issue that the Dems have. Not only is she married to a man, but they have two kids, both BOYS...and she married at age 21, and is still married to the same guy.
She never had a chance with the Left.
“...but Id ask you keep in mind some gratuitous slams have been posted on this very forum regarding Obamas family...”
I’ve been guilty of that. But, the difference between myself (probably including others here)...and the liberals saying these things? I’ll readily admit I was wrong to say those things, and maybe even offer an apology. Liberals? Never.
Obama is slammed here because of his evil deeds, his evil backers, and being a spokesman for evil causes.
Leftists attack Dana Loesch and her kind for doing good and trying to keep the rule of law.
Apparently there are those can't seem to form a coherent argument other than calling someone some disgusting ad hominem names.
That goes for both sides of the political aisle. We have rules here on FR against calling other FReepers names. The same needs to be said for calling outsiders vile names.
Learn to argue or debate the substance rather than attack the person who said it.
These attacks on Dana Loesh should teach us what not to say when we don't like the message or the messenger. We stoop down to the gutter level of the liberals when we copy their style of nasty attacks.
Not to forget Michele Bachmann.
That’s someone who I haven’t heard about in a long time. Didn’t she represent Florida orange juice? (Guess I’m showing my age.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.