Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate change could slowly alter Northeast forests
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | March 12, 2018 | by MATT MARKEY

Posted on 03/12/2018 9:28:04 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

BENEDICTA, Maine - An autumn drive through the rugged forests of New England and eastern Canada presents a convincing case that this is the place where postcard images are made.

Looking deeper, biologists see red flags and hear the clanging of alarm bells.

“When I see that forest, I see change,” said Justin Richardson, a biogeochemist and assistant professor in the University of Massachusetts.

Mr. Richardson, who conducted extensive research on the changing climate and its impact on the forests of the region as part of his doctoral work in Dartmouth College’s Department of Earth Sciences, led a 2016 study that concluded climate change is prompting a makeover of the forests of greater New England.

His study concluded that certain climate scenarios project that the stands of coniferous trees in that part of the country will lose 70 to 100 percent of their current range to deciduous trees by 2085 because of increased temperature and precipitation, as well as changes in timber harvesting.

Besides the accompanying impact on the many birds and mammals that utilize this diverse forest habitat, Mr. Richardson said, the climate-related change in the forest will likely alter the way the trees in the region cycle nutrients and store toxic metals in their underlying soil, since coniferous trees hold these materials in the ground for longer periods of time.

(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hoax; propaganda; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2018 9:28:04 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, we know climate change created the Great Lakes.


2 posted on 03/12/2018 9:29:51 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If they’re seeing “red flags” and “hearing bells clanging”, they might want to go see an eye doctor, an ear doctor or a shrink.


3 posted on 03/12/2018 9:30:35 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Most of the area described here was under a thick sheet of ice up until 10,000 years ago — which is barely a blip of time in geological ages.


4 posted on 03/12/2018 9:31:13 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

let’s be real....the ne has 3 times the trees as 200 years ago.....iirc


5 posted on 03/12/2018 9:33:41 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
His study concluded that certain climate scenarios project that the stands of coniferous trees in that part of the country will lose 70 to 100 percent of their current range

Good. Fall foliage is overrated.

6 posted on 03/12/2018 9:33:47 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yeah, ever since the glaciers covering what is now New England receded, leading to the temperate climate that is there now.


7 posted on 03/12/2018 9:34:28 AM PDT by I want the USA back (There are two sexes: male (pronoun HE), and female (pronoun SHE). Denial of this is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Got to laugh acid rain was supposed to wipe out these same forests decades ago.


8 posted on 03/12/2018 9:34:44 AM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Forests ALWAYS change. What a maroon, that guy.


9 posted on 03/12/2018 9:37:53 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Trump has implemented Supply Side Economics!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Or the change could NOT alter the forest. But I can’t see that. Too many trees in the way. ;-)


10 posted on 03/12/2018 9:38:34 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Stop injecting facts into this topic.


11 posted on 03/12/2018 9:38:53 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

“Good. Fall foliage is overrated. “


Coniferous trees don’t get foliage———this will be better for fall foliage.

.


12 posted on 03/12/2018 9:41:42 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

No way. Not slowly. I’d say by April.


13 posted on 03/12/2018 9:41:58 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
changes in timber harvesting

Sounds like they found their man made causation, and it ain't global warming. Add trees to the list of natural resources that have a "peak" limit I guess.

14 posted on 03/12/2018 9:42:58 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

...Climate change could slowly alter Northeast forests...

Yes, Cyclical building and receding glaciers and weath r changes do alter the terrain . How many millions has Al Gore and a few others made on the man made climate change farce? To what extremes are they willing to go to keep the cash flowing? It’s all about money and control.


15 posted on 03/12/2018 9:43:35 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

“Forests ALWAYS change”

Hence petrified redwoods in Arizona.


16 posted on 03/12/2018 9:43:37 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

My understanding is that when the colonists first arrived, New England was largely conifers. The colonists chopped down a lot of trees (clearing land for agriculture, fuel, and ship-building, housing, etc.). As the conifers were harvested, sugar maples and other deciduous trees began to proliferate.

And there was the Chestnut Blight. And there was Dutch Elm disease.

The forests have been changing forever. Climate Change is an assertion not based on facts.


17 posted on 03/12/2018 9:44:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The government cannot protect you and isn't even trying. Self-defense is a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

More of a danger to NE forest is invasive species and unchecked deer. In NW NJ, we have tons of barberry, Russian Olive, etc. Also, because hunting deer is “mean”, they eat all the underbrush. All this leads to an unhealthy forest.

Also, in NJ, we have far too many democrats. They are just unhealthy to be around as well.


18 posted on 03/12/2018 9:45:27 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
per article: "Dartmouth College’s Department of Earth Sciences"

When I was in school, “Earth Science” is what ‘tards, who were incapable of Chemistry or Physics, used to fulfill their “science” graduation requirement.
 

19 posted on 03/12/2018 9:46:29 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (CNN is fake news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
this will be better for fall foliage

Except that once Global Warming really kicks in, there will be no more fall or winter seasons. Deciduous trees will stay green all year, and they will happily thrive on all the extra CO2.

20 posted on 03/12/2018 9:47:52 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson