Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump, GOP leaders face backlash over $1.3 trillion spending package
foxnews.com ^ | March 24, 2018 | Adam Shaw

Posted on 03/24/2018 2:45:13 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

President Trump faces losing support from his base in the wake of his decision Friday to sign a controversial and much-derided $1.3 trillion spending bill -- over not only its size but its failure to fund his campaign promise of a wall on the U.S. southern border.

Trump briefly threatened to veto the legislation, voted through the House and Senate on Thursday and early Friday in order to avoid a government shutdown.

Conservatives balked at the $1.3 trillion price tag, as well as the failure to promote Republican causes such as the defunding of Planned Parenthood and the funding of the wall on the southern border in particular. While the legislation served up $1.6 billion for border security, it mainly consisted of repairs and additions to already existing fencing.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: debt; omnibus; pork; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: MichaelCorleone

Faux may also report that nobody even had a chance to read the 2000+ pages of this monstrosity before voting on it. Dozens of unelected and unaccountable staffers wrote it tainted with their own personal agendas!

Decidedly unAmerican and probably unConstitutional and illegal.

Let them shut down the government, but don’t vote for something you haven’t read!


81 posted on 03/24/2018 6:49:56 PM PDT by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proust
Backlash? Don’t they understand he’s playing 384D intergalactic ping pong?

Anyone ignorant enough to abandon their support for President Trump based on him signing a bloated 6-month spending bill—whil he's fighting an attempted coup by the Deep State—has utterly no sense of perspective.

Indeed, such a person is simply indulging their #NeverTrump impulses.

I opposed this ridiculous spending bill—an overwhelming number of Deplorables did—but I'm not about to stop supporting this President simply because of that. That is abject insanity.

President Trump has earned our trust a dozen times over during the last two years—and he has access to much more information than the resident FR armchair quarterbacks. I trust President Trump's judgement—certainly moreso than knee-jerk second-guessers who seek to make the perfect the enemy of the good—and he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

To review: there's a pervasive coup attempt underway by the Uniparty Swamp, for God's sake! Dropping one's support for President Trump under such circumstances makes one a newly-minted, de facto #NeverTrumper.

#NeverTrump is as #NeverTrump does...

82 posted on 03/24/2018 6:51:57 PM PDT by sargon ("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sargon

Here, here.
What u said.


83 posted on 03/24/2018 6:53:13 PM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Aside from tax reform, exactly what big agenda items have passed this Congress?

He got rolled and we got screwed.


84 posted on 03/24/2018 7:40:41 PM PDT by Adder (Mr. Franklin: We are trying to get the Republic back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sargon

Yes.


85 posted on 03/24/2018 7:41:04 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: research99

The 1974 act and subsequent amendments are codified in 2 USC Sections 601 through 688. I haven’t gone through in detail but it appears 683 and 684 provide the process for the President to request rescission by a “special message” and at least section 688 governs the expedited process for consideration in each house and committee. Debate and amendment rules appear quite strict. Appears everything is a majority vote. No threat of filibuster appears available.


86 posted on 03/24/2018 8:14:55 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh
Thanks for the suggestion and the perspective.

Generally, I concur, but the procedural language is beyond my understanding at the present.

Sometimes, great notions are picked up by external media from FR.

It would be reassuring to hear at least a discussion of the possibility of reversals of some of the most egregious appropriations that we've just learned that were passed.

Will this prospect get a hearing from Rush? Tucker? Senator Ryan? We can only hope.

87 posted on 03/24/2018 8:21:01 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: research99

(Again, Ryan = meaning Senator Rand Paul).


88 posted on 03/24/2018 8:21:45 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: research99

Rescission requests would need to be specific. Trying to rescind the whole omnibus would be wasted effort and worse once a special request is made and fails it cannot be made again. Better to pick things off one at a time.e.g. planned parenthood. While we would like it totally defended realistically try cutting it in half.


89 posted on 03/24/2018 8:29:50 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh
Getting a 50% cut in appropriations identified in the Rand Paul tweets, would represent a WIN for everyone, particularly in an election year.

For example, Senator Schumer could claim credit for delivering to his constituents, half a tunnel (into the Hudson River).

90 posted on 03/24/2018 8:36:38 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: research99

A “rescission act” would actually Be in the form of “special request” from the President per 2 USC 28E or 284 detailing the appropriated amount. I see no reason it would not apply to items funded by the omnibus. Key is to make such requests particular as only one bite at the apple. If request fails can’t make another request against a budgeted item that has a prior failed request.

For example go after planned parenthood in one request. Go after funding for hermit crab studies in a different request


91 posted on 03/24/2018 8:46:39 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: research99

283


92 posted on 03/24/2018 8:53:03 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

Looks like recission is now on the table.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3644662/posts


93 posted on 04/03/2018 4:56:02 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: research99

Thanks for the heads up


94 posted on 04/04/2018 2:47:00 AM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson