Posted on 03/26/2018 4:59:55 AM PDT by huldah1776
The announcement Thursday night that former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton would replace Gen. H.R. McMaster as President Donald Trumps National Security Advisor confirms the arrival of a new, distinctive voice in the Trump administration. On no issue will Boltons firm stance present a bigger departure from establishment dogma than his support for an independent Kurdistan.
Bolton has vocally, consistently supported the establishment of an independent Kurdish state, arguing that the Kurds have proven their ability to govern themselves and earned the support of the United States through their reliable cooperation with Washington against a number of jihadist threats, most prominently the Islamic State (ISIS).
The Kurdish people are divided among territories belonging to Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, making enemies of all these governments. For decadesand in particular recently, when all four countries faced a growing ISIS presence threatening their stabilityKurds of a variety of factions have proven willing to risk the lives of their armies to defend overlapping interests with America. They take their alliance with the United States seriously and rely only on support from Israel among their neighbors.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Prove it. Back that statement up with facts.
So you are stuck on that. Then you would logically lump Bolton in with every elected or appointed official involved in every military action since WW2. Thats a large number of people. And includes Reagan.
No, that never happened. Instead, he pushes the idea of an imperial presidency where the nation's chief executive can wage military campaigns all over the world without any Congressional approval.
Go back and check my link in Post #18. For a guy who allegedly believes that the U.S. Constitution supersedes international law, he had an awful lot to say about the role of the U.S. in an "international community" in the Balkans ... with absolutely no mention of the U.S. Constitution at all.
I voted for Donald Trump because he was never an "elected or appointed official" before he ran for President.
I’d refer you to the LONG discussion about the Bush war in Iraq regarding the “declaration of war” vs. “authorization of the use of military force”. It is a distinction without a difference.
Bolton publicly called for Congress to take action. He was calling on Congress for a “Declaration of War”. I agree with you there. A declaration of war would have meant that we had one specific foe that we were going to war against. Not the case.
I’d also ask you to review the War Powers Resolution.
Your hangups. Not mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.