Highly recommend a short visit to read the entire article.
Liberal in the sense of being excessively applied.
Otherwise, many things called liberal are hardly that.
There’s two types of conservatives right now.
The people who have figured out that they want us dead.
And the people who will be taken by surprise when they make their move.
I no longer believe there can be a peaceful end to the social wars, other than George Orwell's vision. I still don't want a hot civil war, but I cannot imagine a positive outcome without some jolt that reminds people of where government gets its just powers and of our personal responsibility for our own safety. We need to destroy the idea that government can be given a monopoly on power.
Every liberal is a violent totalitarian thug.
The gays made us an implied deal: “Give us ‘marriage’ and we’ll get out of your faces and leave you alone.” They also stated outright that allowing gays to ‘marry’ would never harm straight people.
Well, we gave them what they wanted - in large part to get them out of our faces. Did they get out of our faces and our lives? Do I even need to say more?
I will anyway. Try running a bakery. Try sending your kids to public school. Try letting your daughter to use the bathroom in a Target. Next up for them is ‘normalization’ of adult-child sex.
Does ANYONE here think it will EVER stop on gun control?
As I’ve stated before, they’re in it for the long-game. A friend of mine in California recently said - “Yes, I can still buy (certain) semi-automatic long guns and handguns that meet state restrictions, but I’m not loaded with cash, and it’s just not worth the risk of making a single mistake and becoming a felon here.”
I told him that is EXACTLY what the Left wants, and that is how they are bringing an end to private ownership. This guy should have guns, but will not. He’s totally one of us, politically, loves to shoot, love guns - but ‘common sense gun-safety laws’ (as Hillary calls them) means he’ll likely never be a gun owner. So how far will he go to protect gun owners without having any hardware? Sadly not as far as he would if he owned. And so, the political base defending the Second Amendment (and many, many, other causes we hold dear) gets slowly chipped away - for him, just too expensive now, and too risky.
We are strong now, very strong - but they will continue to chip away. They won’t allow armed civilians in schools because they know FULL WELL what that will mean for their efforts - virtually no more kids being shot up - and without a constant supply of dead kids, the ability to keep squeezing gun owners simply will not exist. Sadly, that’s the level they’re now playing at. It is up to us to decide whether we can play at that level, or should we just concede to them?
No
Not only no, but H*** no!
They want them all, ultimately.
Glad is was able to help.
Not until only evil people have guns.
Bookmark
Ultimately, the gun grabbers’ goal is treason.
NOPE! Because of their Grabber mentality,
There used to nave Pocket Guns, Gentlemen Pocket Office Letter Knives, now that is NO MORE. Ladies used to wear BIG Hat Pins to keep ungentlemanly men at bay as well as little Purse Derringers Old Men used to carry swords and like many Ladies used to seem to always carry Umbrellas with pointed metal ends,
Now all that is no more.
Because of the Grabber mentality,
The gun grabbers goal is to become slaves owned by the state.
When they pry your guns from your cold dead hands they will be satisfied. Until then, no.
The British experience provides the answer. No, it will never be enough. First firearms, then self defense, then knives, then bats and clubs, and then — by then we’re serfs and slaves.
No. If they are eventually successful in banning all guns, they will not rest for more than 90 seconds before calling for bans on knives, clubs, pointed sticks, etc.
It will not end until "We the People" are subjects instead of citizens.
No.
Will our current level of Sodomy ever be enough for progressives?