Skip to comments.
9th Circuit appoints special prosecutor against Sheriff Joe Arpaio
The Washington Times ^
| April 18, 2018
| Alex Swoyer
Posted on 04/18/2018 3:31:58 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-136 last
To: MileHi
I look forward to being enlightened. Post 37 and 38.
To: DoodleDawg
To: DoodleDawg
Accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. Uh, no. It's an admission that there is no justice to be found in our legal system.
123
posted on
04/19/2018 7:11:09 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
To: treetopsandroofs
Like Marc Rich? Like Marc Rich.
To: zeugma
Uh, no. It's an admission that there is no justice to be found in our legal system. Sure it is.
To: Fungi
I am a fungusI heard you were the life of the party fungi.
Or are you a mushroom? They keep you in the dark and feed you lots of bullshit.
126
posted on
04/19/2018 7:23:34 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
To: jazusamo
Isn’t double jeopardy the main issue in this renewed attack?
127
posted on
04/19/2018 7:36:50 AM PDT
by
fwdude
(History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
To: jazusamo
This isnt about Sheriff Joe. This is about destroying the checks and balances that protect us from outright TYRANNY.
128
posted on
04/19/2018 8:18:27 AM PDT
by
Crucial
To: Lurkinanloomin
Those liberal judges didnt like the Joe followed the Constitution like an American should!
129
posted on
04/19/2018 8:20:58 AM PDT
by
Crucial
To: jazusamo
The judiciary has decided it now runs the country.
130
posted on
04/19/2018 9:50:45 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
To: jazusamo
131
posted on
04/19/2018 9:58:46 AM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: headstamp 2
Yep, especially the 9th Circus who seem to make law up as they go along.
132
posted on
04/19/2018 10:02:14 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: zeugma
Right.
There should be examples of wrongful convictions and that the convicted accepted pardons. Scooter Libby being a recent example. Moreover, the government denies constitutional rights to prosecuted individuals and the prosecuted are subjected to endless investigations (ex. Mike Flynn) all the way to the poor farm who have to pay endless court and lawyer fees. It’s not 1915 anymore.
To: MileHi
134
posted on
04/19/2018 2:10:42 PM PDT
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: DoodleDawg
No, a 1915 Supreme Court case. Burdick v. United States. Wasn't that the same year the SCOTUS ruled that the establishment of a Federal Income Tax was constitutional?
135
posted on
04/20/2018 3:28:44 PM PDT
by
houeto
To: houeto
Wasn't that the same year the SCOTUS ruled that the establishment of a Federal Income Tax was constitutional? The ratification of the 16th Amendment in 1913 made income tax constitutional.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-136 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson