Q group is saying Pelosi is toast for revealing her trip to NK and for revealing highest level of intel to press.
The intel was that NK is not a concern as to WHAT they would do with nuke weapons but WHO they would sell them to. NK is a proliferator, will sell nukes to anyone for money. Pelosi said her trip to NK, they said they would sell them to her, to anyone for money.
Q instructed to archive her press conference offline as there is already an effort to scrub it.
My take: Pelosi is trying to discount Trump’s coming achievement with NK by casting it as a big nothing compared to their proliferation.
Next, I recall the suggestion that rogue CIA actors were behind NK and their nuke rattling, that Kim Jong was playing stooge to deep state. Sounds farfetched but maybe not. If it’s true, then Pelosi’s disclosure may be a warning that NK may sell nukes to others (ISIS?) that will erase Trump’s achievement.
Pretty evil thoughts behind this line of analysis.
Next, earlier in the year, Petraeus (who is a democrat compromised and controlled actor) was an invitee at a talk in Manhattan where he played up war with NK as if it was a certainty. The talk was videotaped and it could be seen that Petraeus was bizarrely seen to almost be praying that war would break out with NK. How is this relevant?
War is a business. It’s a diversion. It’s a news headline grabber. It dominates a news cycle.
If war were to break out with NK, would it mean the deep state bad actors could escape through distraction?
Was Pelosi signaling that if Trump were to neutralize NK, another regime or group would be found to take its place?
Q indicated deep state cabal would not get away with it. Q commented that Pelosi’s press conference would be her undoing. I take it to mean the cabal will not get away with what they are doing, war or no war.
Q is careless and ignorant. Pelosi’s comment references missile technology, not nukes. It has been no secret since the 1990s that North Korea will sell missiles and missile technology if they can, and Myanmar and Iran are certainly known to have purchased. What Pelosi said does not sound the least bit classified, it is common knowledge, in the open, among people who follow these issues. Not classified, though of course there would be many reports and details that are classified. But Pelosi does not reference any details or reports.
Would they also sell nukes to just about anyone??? Maybe, but that is NOT what Pelosi’s comment is about. It IS another reason to insist that they end their nuclear weapons programs, of course. But Pelosi’s comment on the video is about missiles, not nukes, and it is not news.
In other words, just "crumbs"