To: conservative98
To: conservative98
To: conservative98
Hung Jury #2 on the way...
To: conservative98
Many lawyers try to nullify "informed consent" documents that are drafted with very explicit terms. At some point they argue that there is no such thing as informed consent because people are stupid.
Consent means things. This judge is now allowing jurors to use their imaginations for this. Swell.
Goodbye to consent.
6 posted on
04/25/2018 11:59:12 AM PDT by
corkoman
To: conservative98
To Bill Cosby, consent was her consuming the spiked drink.....
7 posted on
04/25/2018 12:01:02 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: conservative98
If even one juror doesn't know the meaning of consent that means that there’ll either be a not guilty or a hung jury.
10 posted on
04/25/2018 12:08:38 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
To: conservative98
For God’s sake! These moronic jurors are going to let the old bastard off...again!
12 posted on
04/25/2018 12:09:52 PM PDT by
miserare
( Hillary--you lost! Get over it!!)
To: conservative98
If you don’t know what consent is then you are not qualified to be on a jury.
15 posted on
04/25/2018 12:11:31 PM PDT by
ltc8k6
To: conservative98
I agree with the concern of the Jury. These women willingly go home with him, take off their clothes and years later scream rape if there is money to be had and blame everyone else but themselves.The answer is the same where college girls have sex with athletes. Immediately extricate yourself from the unwanted sex and dial 911 on your little Iphone. Tell the answering person “ I have been raped” . We have great laws designed to punish for proven rape. Don’t wait 15 years and then moan and complain for money ( like with judge Moore) . I suggest the statute of limitations for sexual assault should be 1 week to file a complaint or SHUT UP!!
To: conservative98
A jury could deliberate for a thousand years, and read half of the books in the Library of Congress, and still not come up with a good answer to that question.
19 posted on
04/25/2018 12:15:21 PM PDT by
Haiku Guy
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: conservative98
Half the jury (the fine women of Pennsylvania)..."Miz Scarlett...I don't know nuffin 'bout con-sent."😜
20 posted on
04/25/2018 12:15:21 PM PDT by
miserare
( Hillary--you lost! Get over it!!)
To: conservative98
If the Consent don’t fit the Jury must acquit! Heard that before?!?!
23 posted on
04/25/2018 12:22:03 PM PDT by
Harpotoo
To: conservative98
...... did they need to ask what “is” means as well?
31 posted on
04/25/2018 1:19:16 PM PDT by
VaeVictis
(~Woe to the Conquered~)
To: conservative98
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, court Judge Steven O'Neill told the jurors he could not answer the question. Then there's no way I could vote to convict. The state needs to prove a rape was committed as Job 1.
36 posted on
04/25/2018 2:40:57 PM PDT by
libertylover
(If people come here legally, they're immigrants; if they come here illegally, they're invaders.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
