Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Connecticut is throwing away their leverage IMHO. 7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election.

But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers.

1 posted on 05/07/2018 8:29:42 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?

By the same logic, they should give up the ability to elect its congress reps and senators as well.


58 posted on 05/07/2018 8:53:56 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Odd - this sounds EXACTLY like Connecticut’s legislature is disenfranchising its own citizens.


63 posted on 05/07/2018 8:59:45 AM PDT by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Make them prove that every Vote in every State is legitimate, then they can throw their hissy fit.


66 posted on 05/07/2018 9:00:37 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative ( THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Money money money money


67 posted on 05/07/2018 9:00:42 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So they’re saying if the stupid State voters don’t vote with the popular vote of other States then their vote is wiped out and given to those other States.

Seems unconstitutional to me.


69 posted on 05/07/2018 9:01:47 AM PDT by CodeToad (The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

There is no national popular vote. There are only 50 state votes. Just because the media decides to sum the state votes does not mean there is a national vote total. Too often the American public accepts the media premise.


70 posted on 05/07/2018 9:01:49 AM PDT by Avalon Memories ( Proud Deplorable. Proud born-in-the-USA American Dreamer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

CT is essentially removing its own statehood here.


72 posted on 05/07/2018 9:03:10 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

That would negate the voting for President by citizens of Connecticut altogether.

Another leftist tactic to circumvent the electoral college. It was set up that way for a reason. and this is one of them.


76 posted on 05/07/2018 9:05:14 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
First...I think I've read that such an arrangement is unconstitutional without approval from Congress.Also,the states that have signed on so far are all reliably Rat states so....
78 posted on 05/07/2018 9:05:36 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Pardon my ignorance, but American Samoa which has no electoral votes, but lots of US citzens.......do their vote count in the “national” total?

This whole approach is not well thought out? Can and election be “won” before those in Hawaii finish voting?

82 posted on 05/07/2018 9:07:01 AM PDT by Robert357 ( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

This is actually good news. The election will be invalid. So the democrat loses one more states electoral college votes.


83 posted on 05/07/2018 9:07:18 AM PDT by McGruff (Bring our troops home. Defend our border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

In other words, candidates can safely ignore Connecticut.


85 posted on 05/07/2018 9:08:10 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Bunnies, bunnies, it must be bunnies!! Or maybe midgets....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The Constitution was set up the way it was to prevent populous states from having undue influence on the outcome, and to give smaller states a say in the outcome.

Exactly what they have voted against.


86 posted on 05/07/2018 9:08:11 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

CT now gave all their votes to CA on everything.
You want free stuff for everyone who doesn’t want to work, CA will vote for it.
You want special rights for anyone for just about anything... CA will vote for it.

Fools.


89 posted on 05/07/2018 9:10:55 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers.

Blockade population centers for two weeks, and there would be no population centers...

Maybe that's what the Deplorables should do instead of "voting" in the next "election"...

91 posted on 05/07/2018 9:12:48 AM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I wonder if they care about the voters there, apparently not.


93 posted on 05/07/2018 9:14:13 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Given CT’s voting patterns, that is more likely to benefit us than the Progressives.
CT always goes Democrat - but if Trump wins the popular vote, he gets it.


94 posted on 05/07/2018 9:16:37 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Connecticut is throwing away the Connecticuttians right to vote in Presidential elections.


97 posted on 05/07/2018 9:22:01 AM PDT by arthurus (17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The Connecticut legislature has plenary authority to appoint Electors in any manner they choose.


99 posted on 05/07/2018 9:24:10 AM PDT by Jim Noble (The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

http://www.politifact.com/florida/article/2016/nov/17/electoral-college-vs-popular-vote-could-states-a/


100 posted on 05/07/2018 9:24:57 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson