Connecticut is throwing away their leverage IMHO. 7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election.
But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
By the same logic, they should give up the ability to elect its congress reps and senators as well.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Odd - this sounds EXACTLY like Connecticut’s legislature is disenfranchising its own citizens.
63 posted on
05/07/2018 8:59:45 AM PDT by
Smedley
(It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Make them prove that every Vote in every State is legitimate, then they can throw their hissy fit.
66 posted on
05/07/2018 9:00:37 AM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
( THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
67 posted on
05/07/2018 9:00:42 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So they’re saying if the stupid State voters don’t vote with the popular vote of other States then their vote is wiped out and given to those other States.
Seems unconstitutional to me.
69 posted on
05/07/2018 9:01:47 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
There is no national popular vote. There are only 50 state votes. Just because the media decides to sum the state votes does not mean there is a national vote total. Too often the American public accepts the media premise.
70 posted on
05/07/2018 9:01:49 AM PDT by
Avalon Memories
( Proud Deplorable. Proud born-in-the-USA American Dreamer.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
CT is essentially removing its own statehood here.
72 posted on
05/07/2018 9:03:10 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
That would negate the voting for President by citizens of Connecticut altogether.
Another leftist tactic to circumvent the electoral college. It was set up that way for a reason. and this is one of them.
76 posted on
05/07/2018 9:05:14 AM PDT by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
First...I think I've read that such an arrangement is unconstitutional without approval from Congress.Also,the states that have signed on so far are all reliably Rat states so....
78 posted on
05/07/2018 9:05:36 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Pardon my ignorance, but American Samoa which has no electoral votes, but lots of US citzens.......do their vote count in the “national” total?
This whole approach is not well thought out? Can and election be “won” before those in Hawaii finish voting?
82 posted on
05/07/2018 9:07:01 AM PDT by
Robert357
( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This is actually good news. The election will be invalid. So the democrat loses one more states electoral college votes.
83 posted on
05/07/2018 9:07:18 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Bring our troops home. Defend our border.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
In other words, candidates can safely ignore Connecticut.
85 posted on
05/07/2018 9:08:10 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Bunnies, bunnies, it must be bunnies!! Or maybe midgets....)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Constitution was set up the way it was to prevent populous states from having undue influence on the outcome, and to give smaller states a say in the outcome.
Exactly what they have voted against.
86 posted on
05/07/2018 9:08:11 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
CT now gave all their votes to CA on everything.
You want free stuff for everyone who doesn’t want to work, CA will vote for it.
You want special rights for anyone for just about anything... CA will vote for it.
Fools.
89 posted on
05/07/2018 9:10:55 AM PDT by
Zathras
To: where's_the_Outrage?
But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers. Blockade population centers for two weeks, and there would be no population centers...
Maybe that's what the Deplorables should do instead of "voting" in the next "election"...
91 posted on
05/07/2018 9:12:48 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I wonder if they care about the voters there, apparently not.
93 posted on
05/07/2018 9:14:13 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Given CT’s voting patterns, that is more likely to benefit us than the Progressives.
CT always goes Democrat - but if Trump wins the popular vote, he gets it.
94 posted on
05/07/2018 9:16:37 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Connecticut is throwing away the Connecticuttians right to vote in Presidential elections.
97 posted on
05/07/2018 9:22:01 AM PDT by
arthurus
(17)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Connecticut legislature has plenary authority to appoint Electors in any manner they choose.
99 posted on
05/07/2018 9:24:10 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson