Posted on 05/20/2018 5:43:12 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
ALL of the deep state plays the one-upmanship blackmail game on each other. They don’t let people with integrity into the swamp.
The dialog on that site is amateurish. More canned than a Dragnet episode.
”Everyone knows what to do. Tomorrow will be a busy day for all of us....”Posted May 17, 2018. The day before the school shootings and shooting at Trump’s property.
I want to see these ba$tards before a firing squad.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank you for the link. Whoa. Deep private chat..... “We have it all.” Q
So what are implications to RR? Leveraged white hat? Leveraged black hat? Gray hat? No hat???? And if we know about RR.... we know Q set up an equivalence scale of sorts for RM. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
I am not sure. All I know is I don’t trust Rosenstein.
I’ve read about the Hillary-Huma sex tape scores of times on Q threads. Not one single time did any level-headed poster point out the obvious: that this is a 100% unsourced rumor-hoax,’ with zero credibility.
***********************************************************
There’s 800 people on the Q ping list. A large number of them never post anything. Others choose not to post to certain stories. Just because you didn’t see anyone disagreeing with the story, is not proof that they all believe it. In fact some do not.
I am not sure. All I know is I don’t trust Rosenstein.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I don’t trust him either. All I know is we’re watching a movie....here have some more popcorn!
He has a pizza-lover look about him. Just sayin’.
That is the essence of Q. The total lack of actual evidence means that the secret/unseen evidence means whatever people want it to mean.
I don’t know how many times I’ve read that ludicrously idiotic Hillary-sex tape hoax-story on Q threads. The two most common responses are, A, what fate Hillary should suffer (which is typically coupled with the comment that she can never be made to suffer as much as the child did), and B, speculation as to when the tape will be released.
There’s no point in arguing that people who didn’t respond believe one thing or another. The point is they *didn’t respond*—all they added to the discussion was silence.
And there is not point in stating that all 800 people on the Q list believe something when there is no proof that they do, I do have personal knowledge that some people on the Q list do not believe that story.
Unless you have the ability to read minds, then those statements are denigrating a lot of people who may or may not believe that particular story.
It would be helpful to qualify your statement instead of accusing everyone there of something you may believe to be true but have no way of knowing.
Silence does not mean agreement, in fact it’s a head’s up in communication that a few probing questions are in order to ascertain the true situation.
One thing I have noticed about MOST Qers. They get very worked up and hostile toward people who don’t subscribe to the Q mythos.
One thing I have noticed about 99.9% of Qers who take issue with me. They make all kinds of accusations but rarely if ever quote what I actually said.
What specific statement that I made has got you so aggressively on the attack? Please quote my exact words; thank you.
I thought we were having a friendly discussion. I certainly was not trying to attack anyone. I am really sorry you feel so defensive.
YOUR ORIGINAL POST:
Gullible is the word I use. Simply put, people who believe there’s a Hillary sex tape that includes the cannibalism of a live child will believe *ANYTHING*. And please don’t tell me Qers don’t believe it. I’ve read about the Hillary-Huma sex tape scores of times on Q threads. Not one single time did any level-headed poster point out the obvious: that this is a 100% unsourced rumor-hoax,’ with zero credibility.
************************************************************
I was merely trying to point out that not all people on the Q thread believe that story. Your post indicates they do.
That sounds like a smear as written. A better way of communicating that would be to qualify that statement to acknowledge that there may be some who do not believe it. Silence is not agreement, and I don’t think you are a mind reader.
Normally I would have remained silent and go right on by your post, but that sentence about no one speaking up made me feel that I should speak up and let you know that it is false that Qers believe that story - some do but some do not.
‘I was merely trying to point out that not all people on the Q thread believe that story. Your post indicates they do.’
Please reread what I actually said. It is 100% true.
I have read it sufficiently to know that it states that Qers believe that story and you said-”And please don’t tell me Qers don’t believe it.”
Are you now acknowledging that some Qer’s do not believe it, or are you stating firmly Qer’s believe it - no exceptions?
‘I’ve read about the Hillary-Huma sex tape scores of times on Q threads. Not one single time did any level-headed poster point out the obvious: that this is a 100% unsourced rumor-hoax,’ with zero credibility.’
So you are asserting that all people on Q thread believe that story, or are you admitting that some do not?
Stop badgering me. My original words are true, and speak for themselves.
Sorry, you just never answered my Question.
I guess you don’t want to admit that all Qer’s don’t believe that story even though you said they do.
I think I’ve been pretty polite, considering what you said about Qer’s.
Regards.
It’s not at all polite to substitute your own words and interpretation for what I actually said. I’m so tired of being hounded by Qers on trumped up accusations. If THE TRUTH hurts, then your problem is with the truth, not with me.
It’s not at all polite to substitute your own words and interpretation for what I actually said. I’m so tired of being hounded by Qers on trumped up accusations. If THE TRUTH hurts, then your problem is with the truth, not with me.
*********************************************************
What exactly did I misinterpret? Here’s your original post:
[Gullible is the word I use. Simply put, people who believe there’s a Hillary sex tape that includes the cannibalism of a live child will believe *ANYTHING*.
And please don’t tell me Qers don’t believe it. I’ve read about the Hillary-Huma sex tape scores of times on Q threads. Not one single time did any level-headed poster point out the obvious: that this is a 100% unsourced rumor-hoax,’ with zero credibility.]
************************************************************
You are saying that Qers believe the Video story are you not?
"It’s not at all polite to substitute your own words and interpretation for what I actually said. I’m so tired of being hounded by Qers on trumped up accusations."
"Stop badgering me."
"What specific statement that I made has got you so aggressively on the attack?"
_______________________________
LOL ....... I see that pesky PERSECUTION COMPLEX of yours is still a drag.
Quite seriously, have you ever wondered why you continually find the need to tell numbers of different posters here to quit picking on you?
Think about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.