[Steely Tom]

I heard Mark Levin's analysis on the Sean Hannity TV show. It seems very well thought out, and like a powerful issue that undercuts the entire legitimacy of Mueller kangaroo investigation.

Basically, M. Levin's position is that Mueller has been given the powers and latitude of an Assistant United States Attorney, and that under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, he must be confirmed by Congress in order to hold this position.

At the end of his Hannity segment, he addressed every person being investigated by Mueller, and every attorney representing those persons directly, saying this line of defense should be raised in their pleadings.

[ExTexasRedhead]

I hope President Trump was watching Levin on Hannity tonight. If not, I’m sure Sean will give him a heads up.

[rolling_stone]

substance over form...

[Cobra64]

THIS, and other Levin’s positions on this mess is why Trump should fire Sessions and appoint Levin as AG. Levin is smart and tough. Enough with all the legal tip-toeing and pearl clutching that’s been going on the last 18 months.

[damper99]

Levin raises good points that would apply if this investigation was pursuing a democrat president. In the current circumstance, I’m surprised the learned Levin forgot that the Constitution doesn’t apply to Mueller.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

At the end of his Hannity segment, he addressed every person being investigated by Mueller, and every attorney representing those persons directly, saying this line of defense should be raised in their pleadings.

. . . which would seem to raise the question of whether there is such a thing as an amicus brief which Levin himself could file with the court.