Posted on 05/28/2018 11:21:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
Over the past couple of weeks, the liberal media has clinched the gold medal in the linguistic gymnastics. As the Left goes through their 400,000th box of popcorn waiting for the smoking gun that will never come that shows the Kremlin colluding with the Trump team to tilt the election, new news arose. The FBI seems to have spied on the Trump campaign during the 2016 electionand yes, it looks like it was politically motivated. But you seefor some, its not spying; our intelligence apparatus just had a confidential informant trying to glean information based on false pretenses. The FBI asset used for this operation pretty much exposed by the media. They never named him; only The Daily Caller had the gumption to do it. And its not a swipe at them. All the information needed on reveal him was public knowledge. There was zero threat to our national security by them publishing his name, even Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, a left-leaning publication, noted this as well, adding that this persons activities were reported on back in 1983, when it was exposed that he was involved in a spy operation to feed the Reagan campaign classified information about then-President Jimmy Carters foreign policy. He was well known.
Stefan Halper is the longtime CIA operative and Cambridge University professor who approached Carter Page, Sam Clovis, and George Papadopoulos during the 2016 campaign. With Page, its a bit more interesting since his encounter with him occurred prior to July of 2016, the date which the FBI said was the official start of the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump team (WSJ):
Multiple media sources have now confirmed that American academic Stefan Halper is the top secret informant the FBI asked to sidle up to Trump campaign officials in 2016. Some questions follow: Who asked Mr. Halper to keep tabs on the Trump officials, and when and why?
The answers go to the credibility of the Federal Bureau of Investigations claim that it didnt open an official counterintelligence probe into Trump-Russia collusion until July 31, 2016. The answers might also show if Obama Administration officials knew about this mission, or if political actors working for the Clinton campaign such as Fusion GPS played a role.
One mystery concerns Mr. Halpers interaction with Trump aide Carter Page. The New York Times reported on Friday that Mr. Halpers contact with Trump officials happened only after the July 31 launch of the probe.
[ ]
But Mr. Page tells us he actually met Mr. Halper in mid-July, at a symposium at Englands University of Cambridge, where Mr. Halper is an emeritus professor. Mr. Page says the invitation to that event came much earlierthe end of May or early June. Mr. Page declined to say who invited him but says it was someone other than Mr. Halper.
Mr. Halper had a central role in the symposium. The event was hosted by the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (CRASSH), a Cambridge research institute.
[ ]
For the record, Mr. Page says he had never interacted with the CRASSH program at Cambridge before that early summer 2016 invitation. And while he did not speak at the event, he says the organizers paid his round-trip airfare from New York.
Perhaps all of this is a crazy coincidence, but House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is right to investigate.
Former CBS News investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson alleged that the Obama White House spied on the Trump team, as they did with her (allegedly). Shes still navigating the legal waters on that front. Yet, in The Hill, she listed eight ways that point to how this whole operation was politically motivated. Here are some of them:
Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russias ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.
The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016.
Electronic surveillance was used to listen in on three Trump transition officials in Trump Tower Flynn, Bannon and Kushner as they met in an official capacity with the United Arab Emirates crown prince.
The FBI also reportedly wiretapped Flynns phone conversation with Kislyak on Dec. 31, 2016, as part of routine surveillance of Kislyak.
[ ]
Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval.
[ ]
Unmasking identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Power, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yates, former deputy attorney general.
Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be masked, or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared.
However, its been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.
Prior to that revelation, Clapper claimed ignorance. When asked if he knew of unmasking requests by any ambassador, including Power, he testified: I don't know. Maybe it's ringing a vague bell but I'm not I could not answer with any confidence.
[ ]
Changing the rules
On Dec. 15, 2016 the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections.
Media strategy
Former CIA Director John Brennan and Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative including on the very issues under investigation.
[ ]
Theres been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of leaks some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trumps interests.
Besides Halper, Attkisson added James Comeys buddy, Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked the former FBI directors memos to The New York Times. Hes a special government employee working for the FBI. And we know Comey leaked the memos in order to get a special counsel, who turned out to be Robert Mueller, appointed to investigate the collusion allegations, which was done via appointment by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The Washington Times Larry OConnor, who also quarterbacks the afternoon drive on weekdays for WMAL, had Attkisson on his program on May 23, to discuss her views on this investigation:
You would not normally use a sledgehammer to kill an ant if you can wipe him off with a feather duster. Using surveillance inside a political campaign should be almost a last resort under our constitution. Spying on US citizens is something that is supposed to be almost never done and if done at all, is super justified and supervised. And, really, even more so if youre talking about a political campaign or a journalist because of the potential that it looks like abuse or it could be abuse.
Yet, there always seems to be one character that is left off the list for scrutiny: Barack Obama. All of thisthe whole operationoccurred under his administration; his intelligence agents executed the plan, his DOJ/FBI was involved. What did Obama know and when did he know it? There is no way that the Obama White House was out of the loop for any of this. They knew it was going on, they had to; no one could have moved an inch on this without their permission.
(H/T Larry O'Connor)
Recall that during the time the Iran deal was shoved down the country’s throat, Brennan and Clapper were spying on congress and Netanyahu.
Brennan and clapper must be questioned because they made a lot of the ops. And fake information sound legitimate.
A second Special Counsel will move forward at a glacial pace. We are talking years (not weeks or months) before anything would come to a resolution. A Special Counsel follows these steps:
1. Hire dozens and dozens of lawyers and staff (weeks to months)
2. "Investigate", which takes months to years
3. Draft and write reports (months to years)
I believe the reason President Trump is not calling for a second Special Counsel is because he knows that US Attorney Huber is better than a Special Counsel. Read GWU Law Professor Jonathon Turley's opinion piece on this from a few weeks ago.
We don't need another Mueller. The DOJ must use its already existing powers to go after the criminals.
NOW it makes sense.
Think October surprise for Donald Trumps big declassification and un-redacting of FISA and other “top secret” DOJ memos and documents.
No concession, no mercy.
No mercy, no quarter
The punishment for the conspiratorial crimes against the Republic must be death. At a minimum punishment must be life in a prison where pardon is impossible.
The Conspiracy we are witnessing is the most important event in the history of the Republic. The conspirators must be severely delt with if there is to be an America
You are RIGHT ON, bert. Sadly, too many American voters are so manipulated by the enemy/media that they cannot and will not see it. Guillotines from orbit, its the only way to clean out the infestation of media.
Spying is now routine because Comey or some other idiot in charge makes up a rationale, like Russian interference in elections, trumps it up and then uses it for political purposes. He really should be jailed if our justice system was truly blind.
I cant see how...Trump was ever elected.....
If given a free choice the American voter will always make the right decision The media just has to get out of the way
I’m not 100 percent sold on Huber being an agent of DS destruction, either. He was appointed by Obama after all, there had to be something in his background that gave Obama reason to believe he was a lefty. Same with Horowitz, and when Trump appointed Rosenstein, I was saying why appoint anyone who Obama was ok with. There are some who believe that Huber and Horowitz are straight shooters who are going to do grave damage to the DS and the Russia collusion shenanigans, and I sure hope they are right. Only time will tell.
Matt Vespa has done an excellent re the history of these acts of sedition against our country, candidate Trump, Elected President Trump and President Trump.
He tells which DOJ/FBI and white house thugs were involved in these acts of sedition.
Turley calls him “General Sessions.” That tells me right there all I need to know.
That is one of my pet peeves, too. The AG is not a general, any more than a general manager of a grocery store is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.