A dirty little secret of these Title IX Star Chambers is a disproportionate number of the men accused are African-American.
Deliberate injustice.
And the overt racism of the “progressives.”
Mr. Mumphrey should send a thank you letter to Barack Obama.
Seriously, though, these schools claim they are complying with Title IX, but nothing in Title IX requires them to throw out due process and engage in witch-hunts - and if it did, then Title IX would be unconstitutional.
In this article we see that even the Slimes is starting to ask some questions about these Stalinesque secret trials &c. They don’t go so far as to say it was a bad idea of course, but we’ll take what we can get.
This just makes me sick. Mumphrey provided exculpatory evidence and was cleared twice by an accuser-friendly college “justice” system, but because the accuser didn’t like the outcome, she destroys his livelihood anyway. I hope he successfully sues anyone and everyone who has fingerprints on this gross travesty of justice.
Can’t get passed pay wall
I’ve read several universities plan to keep this unjust kangaroo court system even though the original dear colleague letter is no longer policy.
I’d like to see the Trump administration send out another dear colleague letter informing universities that they WILL stop this crap immediately and WILL provide due process or all federal funding for everything including student loans will be cut off. And they have about 30 days to comply.
Regret is not rape.
Does this start to smell like the treatment of men under Biden’s “Violence Against Women” law where all the woman has to do is complain, move with the kids into a halfway house, and start to drink at the magical fountain, or what?
This practice needs to come to an end. If it cannot be handled by the cops it isn’t worth continuing.
Too much injustice.
I would not call it “college justice.” Call it “progressive justice.”
In this case both parties were full-time students at Michigan State. Therefore MSU was able to handle the matter totally internally. What would have been the outcome if the male had not been a student at MSU yet every other detail of the incident remained the same? MSU would not have had any jurisdiction over the male. Then what recourse would the female have had? It appears her only option would have been to go to the police. Why should there be any legal difference in the two scenarios?
MSU has a large endowment. I hope he and his lawyer get a large slice of it.
MSU has a large endowment. I hope he and his lawyer get a large slice of it.
MSU has a large endowment. I hope he and his lawyer get a large slice of it.
MSU has a large endowment. I hope he and his lawyer get a large slice of it.
Alleged criminal conduct needs to be investigated by law enforcement officers and prosecuted in a real court.