President Trump Highlights Dobbs Segment Outlining December 2015 FBI CoIntel Operation….

theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | 6/5/18 | sundance

[a little elbow grease]

The backstory is important here. Two days ago internet researcher Nick Falco discovered a potentially damning text dated December 28th 2015 within a previously released set of Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages.

The original text was redacted in one section (Page #31); however, somehow further down the release (Page #159) the same text was not redacted. It is presumed the FBI redacted the word “lures”, whereas the IG did not.

In one release (page #31) the word “lures” was redacted. In the second release (page #159) it was NOT redacted.

[a little elbow grease]

Full title:

#Spygate – President Trump Highlights Lou Dobbs Segment Outlining December 2015 FBI CoIntel Operation….

[a little elbow grease]

From the comments section:

Charlotte says: June 6, 2018 at 3:53 am

Halper was a crack cocaine addict. Barry Soetoro was a cocaine addict. Was that a pre-requisite for the job?

OMG! Anti-Trump Deep State Spy Stefan Halper Was Busted on Crack Cocaine Charges!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/omg-anti-trump-deep-state-spy-stefan-halper-was-busted-on-crack-cocaine-charges/

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

Here’s the hyperlink:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/omg-anti-trump-deep-state-spy-stefan-halper-was-busted-on-crack-cocaine-charges/

[a little elbow grease]

Thank you ........

[Flick Lives]

OMG! Anti-Trump Deep State Spy Stefan Halper Was Busted on Crack Cocaine Charges!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/omg-anti-trump-deep-state-spy-stefan-halper-was-busted-on-crack-cocaine-charges/

—

Interestingly, it looks like Halper walked from those crack cocaine charges with only a $400 fine. Any brother charged for possessing crack would be doing hard time. But, I guess the biggest gang of all, the FBI, protects its own.

[where's_the_Outrage?]

What criteria did the FBI use to redact the word “lures”?

I fail to see National Security implications other than covering up FBI’s possible illegal actions.

[a little elbow grease]

"What criteria did the FBI use to redact the word “lures”?

____________________

I guess they didn't want any of the investigators thinking about "fishing" expeditions.

[a little elbow grease]

"Interestingly, it looks like Halper walked from those crack cocaine charges with only a $400 fine. Any brother charged for possessing crack would be doing hard time. But, I guess the biggest gang of all, the FBI, protects its own."

______________

Ain't American "justice" fair?

/s

[enumerated]

“It is presumed the FBI redacted the word “lures”, whereas the IG did not.”

This makes me wonder how much of the DOJ’s supposed lack of response to congressional oversight - withholding requested documents, heavy redactions, etc... - how much of it is really the DOJ’s fault?

This story makes it sound like the other agencies have a say in what the DOJ can release.

I forget where I read it but someone was suggesting that the State Department might also be pressuring the DOJ to keep certain elements of Spygate under wraps because it could compromise the counterintelligence agencies of the UK and other allies.

My point, or question really, is that while the deep state is obviously trying to cover up its corruption, there may also be legitimate concerns and complications to at least partly explain the DOJ’s apparent lack of transparency.

I know it’s hip in these parts to simply blame everything on sleepy Sessions:

Sessions is working for the deep state or he’s been ‘compromised’ and deep state Rosenstien is running the show. Trump can’t fire either of them because McConnell won’t allow it. So the narrative goes....

But for me that narrative just doesn’t add up - there’s got to be more going on than meets the eye.

[kiryandil]

I know it’s hip in these parts to simply blame everything on sleepy Sessions:

These people would have to be gagged in the sixth inning of a baseball game because they'd be screaming that it's "Game Over, Man!!!" if their team was a run behind...   

[a little elbow grease]

This story makes it sound like the other agencies have a say in what the DOJ can release. ----------- Most likely

I forget where I read it but someone was suggesting that the State Department might also be pressuring the DOJ to keep certain elements of Spygate under wraps because it could compromise the counterintelligence agencies of the UK and other allies. ------------ Well, it certainly could. I say expose them for what they are.

My point, or question really, is that while the deep state is obviously trying to cover up its corruption, there may also be legitimate concerns and complications to at least partly explain the DOJ’s apparent lack of transparency. ---------- I hear you.

I know it’s hip in these parts to simply blame everything on sleepy Sessions:

Sessions is working for the deep state or he’s been ‘compromised’ and deep state Rosenstien is running the show. Trump can’t fire either of them because McConnell won’t allow it. So the narrative goes....

But for me that narrative just doesn’t add up - there’s got to be more going on than meets the eye. ------------- You are most certainly correct. None of us can POSSIBLY know half of the details and concerns that have dominated actions and apparent inaction.

[a little elbow grease]

"These people would have to be gagged in the sixth inning of a baseball game because they'd be screaming that it's "Game Over, Man!!!" if their team was a run behind... "

______________________

You are so right. I wonder what percentage of what I call distracted haters, I wonder how many are only here to act like concerned Trump people who hate a few of the people working around him.

I'll bet there are about 40 or 50 of them at least. They never end with their bile.

[bitt]

p