Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
I think what he said was the cost savings would be a side benefit. He sort-of conceded that this was a small concession to Kim (probably to help him save face).
Does not hurt our readiness - we are still training, just a pause in large-scale maneuvers.
12 posted on 06/13/2018 5:28:15 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Psalm 73

Yes Lindsay, all the “winning” would never have happened if you hadn’t stuck your nose in the process. Go back to peanut country.


13 posted on 06/13/2018 5:31:42 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Psalm 73
Good insights. War games tend to be used as shows of might and capability to crush. To suspend them as a show of good faith (and as you say, to let Kim save face) seems more than reasonable, since the US forces can always fire up an exercise later if that kind of show of force is necessary. The real question is:

Why would a US senator publicly challenge the president of his own party regarding a perfectly reasonable negotiation technique?

15 posted on 06/13/2018 5:38:07 AM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson