Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, it seems like Obama's wise Latina has shown her true colors and become a screechy Latina. As if this wasn't expected.

For the record, American law and Constitutional protections do not apply to those who are not American citizens. Period. End of story. QED. Any more questions?

1 posted on 06/26/2018 9:11:03 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: tom h

Maybe she should step down as a Justice and run for President? What’s that? She won’t? Why not? She knows she can’t win? Well, then she should STFU!


2 posted on 06/26/2018 9:15:08 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

The wise Latina better watch her Leftist mouth. Trump has the ability to close the borders to any security threat. Wonder if a religion that commands violent and stealth Jihad would qualify?


3 posted on 06/26/2018 9:15:28 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h
"unrelenting attack on the Muslim religion and its follow­ers"

The word "religion" should be changed to "mass movement."

4 posted on 06/26/2018 9:15:29 PM PDT by snarkpup ("Socialism is like, 'Hey kid, get in my van. I've got a mountain of candy back there.'"-Styx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Doesn’t she have serious diabetes issues that might sideline her before Justice Ginsburg? Sounds like President Trump might be able to appoint 3 to 5 more justices or more.


5 posted on 06/26/2018 9:15:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h
This woman is unabashedly stupid, and is dertermined to prove it. But stupid people don't know they are stupid.
6 posted on 06/26/2018 9:20:40 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

> “The majority holds otherwise by ignoring the facts, misconstruing our legal precedent, and turning a blind eye to the pain and suffering the Proclamation inflicts upon countless families and individuals, many of whom are United States citizens. Because that troubling result runs contrary to the Constitution and our precedent, I dissent.”

Well, that’s it. Government actions that cause you pain and suffering are unconstitutional, so Democrats will just have to pack up, go home, and stop bothering Americans.


7 posted on 06/26/2018 9:22:05 PM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Hey Justice Raza: it’s not America’s war against Islam. It’s Islam’s war against America.


8 posted on 06/26/2018 9:23:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

If anyone would know about unrelenting attacks, it would be Trump. He’s been under attack since entering the GOP primaries.


9 posted on 06/26/2018 9:27:37 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

She’s dragging religion into her Supreme Court decision. Isn’t that against the separation of church and state and therefore, unconstitutional?


10 posted on 06/26/2018 9:28:10 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

But, but, but...how can it be an “unrelenting” attack on “the Muslim religion” when we keep being told that Trump is attacking the crimmigrants coming up from Latin America?

Which is it?


11 posted on 06/26/2018 9:28:55 PM PDT by TXBlair (We will not forget Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

what a poor choice for a judge/justice!


14 posted on 06/26/2018 9:33:00 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( "Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Laura Ingram showed the list of the ten countries with the highest muslim populations. NONE of them are on the travel restrictions list.


15 posted on 06/26/2018 9:33:49 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

islam is a militant death cult. The epitome of a subversive ideology. Anti-Constitution. Anti-American. Anti-natural law. Pro-slavery....islam means to submit. It’s a submission to satan.

Anyone that openly advocates the importation of this enemy is a traitor and should be treated as such.


16 posted on 06/26/2018 9:34:01 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Jeff Sessions IS the insurance policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

These comments have no legal relevance. Trumps campaign rhetoric and (to be honest) some rhetorical missteps concerning Muslims were never part of this legal matter. The matter was: Does the President have the right to do a travel ban? Answer: Yes. Period. It’s a shame and very sad the vote wasnt 9-0.

I hear pundits talk about Civil rights of people and whether Trump was being racists. Here’s another fact: Trump can ban anyone for any reason. It’s an absolute power given to the president. So, while talking about race are strong moral arguments they are never these poor legal Arguments. The travel ban was never a serious legal matter and a huge waste of the courts time. This power was resolved in the 1700’s.

It is, however, a legitimate political matter...as all presidential decisions ultimately are. If it bothers you that Trump did the travel ban, don’t vote for him. It’s that simple snowflakes!!!


17 posted on 06/26/2018 9:34:48 PM PDT by Mustangman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Nothing but projection.


18 posted on 06/26/2018 9:40:04 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Justice Sonya Bologna had months to try to persuade at least four of her fellow Justices to join her in her opinion, but she failed to do so.

Her extra-judicial emotionalism, ad hominem attacks, and lack of understanding of the Constitution clearly contributed to her failure, and being a sore loser has contributed to her eroding reputation as someone to be taken seriously.

Case closed.


19 posted on 06/26/2018 9:40:27 PM PDT by humbleexpert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Wise latbian or wise lestina? You decide....


22 posted on 06/26/2018 9:44:01 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

She must recuse herself from any case dealing with illegal immigration or security measures against terrorism because she has demonstrated that she is too biased to make a rationale objective decision.


24 posted on 06/26/2018 9:46:02 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

And she says it like it is a bad thing?!?!?!


27 posted on 06/26/2018 9:49:02 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

If she was sane, she’d have an issue with muslims and their world wide raping and murdering spree.


28 posted on 06/26/2018 9:49:08 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson