[luv2ski]

also from SCOTUS blog: Of practical importance, the Court also holds that employees must affirmatively consent before fees can be withheld from their paychecks —the system must be opt-in, not opt-out.

[bob_esb]

thank you for this luv2skii.

I had not seen the following - to quote DT. This is HUUUGGE

---

also from SCOTUS blog: Of practical importance, the Court also holds that employees must affirmatively consent before fees can be withheld from their paychecks —the system must be opt-in, not opt-out.

[CottonBall]

Excellent! I remember when I started teaching, and I was asking about being exempt from the union. I was told I had to still pay the collective-bargaining fees, and that I would have to jump through hoops to get out of the rest. Lots of I rolling and sighing and paperwork.Of course I was blackballed at that point and my job offer rescinded. I kind a new it would be :-).

Taking money from people shouldn’t be automatic, the supreme’s got this one right.

[zeugma]

also from SCOTUS blog: Of practical importance, the Court also holds that employees must affirmatively consent before fees can be withheld from their paychecks —the system must be opt-in, not opt-out.

That is a huge change.