Posted on 06/28/2018 12:49:14 AM PDT by a little elbow grease
The woman is a clueless left wing dolt.
Kamala Harris demonstrates with absolute clarity the disciplined mindset of those who oppose this nation and its constitution who will say whatever lie and distortion they can imagine to bring about the absolute destruction of our great nation. President Trump has appointed the most highly qualified Constitutional judges in every single one of his recommendations. Kamala Harris is a glib liar with no truth or decency in her.
“...he’s been appoint people who have refused to agree that Brown v. Board of Education is settled law.”
She certainly doesn’t think that the 2nd Amendment is settled law.
Why not both?!
Trump appoints Constitutionalist.
Democrats claim the Constitutionalist will destroy the Constitution.
It’s loony, but...
...it’s because the left specializes in destroying the things they claim to be the caretakers for; and they can’t imagine anyone acting any other way. This is due to their low IQs.
In soggy-manure’s dissent to the travel ban decision, she never once brought up a Constitutional point. It was all her “wise latina” feelings crap.
That is destructive.
Willie Brown’s concubine speaks!
To Harris, #metoo was a career path.
Yup. It’s leftist projection as usual.
That response is hilarious.
Yep. I’ve smelled Creeper Joe Biden and Willie Brown’s side piece Kamala for a long while, as who the pathetic Dem’s trot out. Kamala has a lot of skeleton in her closet. Should be funny.....
Ask her how many Constitutional Amendments have been passed in the last 50 years and why so few?
You will get a blank stare from her, if that.
But the real reason is its so much easier to pack the court with corrupt judges then to actually pass amendments.
That’s why the left uses the phrase “Living, breathing, Constitution.”
So she’s an anchor baby?
idiot
Info on the list that is the same list as President Trump used to pick his last USSC justice
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/kennedy-supreme-court-winners/2018/06/27/id/868790/
What EXACTLY did she mean by “IF”?
Was she inciting violence against the President of the United States?
Fools...
The very last sentence was meant to convey that the comments WERE NOT direct at you. LINK
Thank you for the response. Have a good one...
Yes, great point.
And I might add, we can do it without the violence and unConstitutional methods.
LOL
Good one...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.