Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice
What did come was DNA results (.7 percent) from western Africa (probably the region of Gambia to Ghana). [...] But that wasn’t really the end of the DNA business. There is a small bit of Ashkenazi Jewish blood (.5 percent showed up).

I strongly doubt, given the current State of the Art, that these DNA tests are truly that precise.

Regards,

36 posted on 06/28/2018 9:13:30 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek
Yes, very low percentages of a certain ancestry may be meaningless. I have taken the DNA test with several companies and received wildly different ethnic breakdowns (some of which bear little resemblance to what I know from genealogical research).

If you go back several generations, you have ancestors from whom you have inherited no DNA at all. So lack of any Native American DNA would not conclusively prove that Liz Warren is lying. Even though we know that she is.

No American Indian ancestry myself, but I had cousins in the 19th century who married Cherokees and went with their families on the Trail of Tears to Indian Territory--while Liz Warren's white ancestors were prodding them along.

46 posted on 06/28/2018 6:14:35 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson