Skip to comments.
Supreme Court throws out ruling in case protecting unions from class-action lawsuits
Washington Examiner ^
| July 02, 2018
| Sean Higgins
Posted on 07/03/2018 7:00:04 AM PDT by GonzoII
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: ealgeone
I pray, but I doubt it. Just try to get the public employees away from guaranteed income and HUGH pensions forever!!
61
posted on
07/03/2018 9:05:17 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: bkopto
62
posted on
07/03/2018 9:32:53 AM PDT
by
GonzoII
("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
To: ConservativeWarrior
“Wonder what they’ll cut first. Pension payments?“
Not here in IL short of a Chapter 9 Bankruptcy filing. It’s right there in our State Constitution.
L
63
posted on
07/03/2018 10:14:28 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
in light of... Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Janus found that coerced dues from nonunion public-sector workers were unconstitutional.
Illegally forcing non-unionized workers into a union, solely for the benefit to the union, which then kicked back campaign contributions, is a Demagogic Party SOP. Thanks GonzoII.
64
posted on
07/03/2018 11:27:24 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: GonzoII
To: Red Badger
My goodness...this term for the Court was one of the best ever.
To: GonzoII
I proudly agree with Democrat POTUS FDR on one issue, Public Service Unions should not be allowed to exist.
67
posted on
07/04/2018 8:31:32 AM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: ealgeone
I want to see the people forced into unionization suing, like the caregivers illegally “Unionized” per a sham vote and then had part of their Medicaid payments garnished for union dues.
68
posted on
07/04/2018 6:56:50 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: CodeToad
It is Going to force the Unions to open their books, can’t wait !!
To: Republican Wildcat
Look out for more ‘WINNING!’ in FUTURE Courts!............................
70
posted on
07/05/2018 6:12:23 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
To: Boogieman
That ruling may have been specific only to public sector unions, but it doesn’t mean the same legal reasoning wouldn’t apply to non-public sector unions. The court probably just needs to get another case in front of it with a different situation in order to extend the ruling.
Actually, it would. Public and private unions are in a different situation - one of them bargains with the employer who pays the bills, the other bargains with overpaid lawyers who are probably in their own union, and the payer (taxpayers) aren't represented against the union. A private employer has the power to choose to make union membership a condition of employment. The public sector doesn't have that power.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson