Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy Ready to Protect Freedom of Navigation in Strait of Hormuz Amid Iran Threat
gCaptain ^ | July 5, 2018 | Bozorgmehr Sharafedin

Posted on 07/05/2018 7:34:00 PM PDT by artichokegrower

The U.S. Navy stands ready to ensure free navigation and the flow of commerce, the U.S. military’s Central Command said on Thursday, as Iran’s Revolutionary Guards warned they would block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz if necessary.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and some senior military commanders have threatened in recent days to disrupt oil shipments from the Gulf countries if Washington tries to cut Tehran’s exports.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: energy; freedomoftheseas; hamas; hassannasrallah; hezbollah; iran; iransconcerntrolls; irgc; jordan; lebanon; mullahworshippers; nexttroll; oilprices; putinsbuttboys; raidertroll; rouhani; straightofhormuz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: rockinqsranch

“I don’t recall the Saudi’s holding hostage our Embassy, and personnel of that Embassy for over a year. I don’t recall the Saudi’s hijacking our naval personnel, humiliating them for propaganda purposes, nor do I recall the Saudi’s aggressively supporting armed insurrections all over the ME with the intent of dominating the region. I’ve never heard the Saudi’s threaten death to America.

The Saudi’s aren’t pure as driven snow by any means. Yes a percentage of the hijackers of 9/11 were of Saudi origin, but I haven’t read of solid conclusion those persons were supported by the Saudi government. Yes I do think they may have been supported by factions within as the Saudi government was at the time quite extensive, and somewhat decentralized, but no proof has ever been forthcoming.”

BINGO.


21 posted on 07/05/2018 10:25:02 PM PDT by flaglady47 (TRUMP 45 - will lethargic Conservatives let him be impeached by Dems? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

I couldn’t disagree with you more. The fact is, once those Mullahs obtain their weapons, they will use them. You advocate we wait until they can take out our navy and our allies in a dozen nuclear strikes. Adults in charge now are not going to wait for that.


22 posted on 07/05/2018 10:41:13 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

The 9/11 attack didn’t have any Saudis in leadership roles, they were all just the muscle. Every country in the region including Saudi Arabia suffered al Qaeda attacks except for IRAN. The Saudis themselves went after and shut down a charity that had fed Saudi pension money to AQ while the US balked at going after questionable branches of the same charity.
The leadership of the Hamburg cell was two Syrians- one an Imam and the other a business man with a Syrian intel background. The lead Hamburg cell hijacker, Atta, was Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood with a contacts in Syria.

The Zarqawi cell in Baghdad in 2002 was composed of Egyptians... it later merged with Iraqi intel and evolved into ISIS. Zarqawi was also smuggling boss who controlled a smuggling route from the Afghan-Pakistan border through Iran to Iraq and Syria- he could not have done it without Iran’s approval.

Al Qaeda’s second-in-command was its current leader- Zawahiri, an Egyptian with familial ties at least one of Iran’s mullahs. Bin Laden’s mother, whom he called on 9/11, was Syrian. His family took shelter in Iran.

Two of the hijackers attended the Malaysian terror summit and were met with an Iraqi - this summit was where the USS The Sullivans and USS Cole attacks were planned, and while the USS The Sullivans attack did not succeed, the USS Cole was taken out by a bomb designed with the assistance of Hezbollah. Others were Palestinian. alQaeda holed up in Iran, not Saudi Arabia, after we went into Afghanistan.

AQ’s backers in the UK were al Mihijiroun at the Finsbury mosque - they were an opposition group seeking the overthrow of the House of Saud.


23 posted on 07/05/2018 11:14:26 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

North Korea’s nuclear program was aided by Iranian scientists; North Korean researchers and techs in turn worked in Syria until the Israelis destroyed the Syrian site.
No Saudis involved.

Kim’s stupid threats were aimed at getting aide from weak, easily scared westerners. He stopped that crap when it no longer got him the expected food aide or his army, but instead a bucket of trash talk from an unimpressed and unintimidated Trump.


24 posted on 07/05/2018 11:25:54 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
If Iran cannot sell its oil under U.S. pressure, then no other regional country will be allowed to either, said Mohammad Ali Jafari, who commands the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran’s most powerful military force.

Translation: "Bit@# Slap me please."

25 posted on 07/06/2018 3:34:29 AM PDT by trebb (Too many "Conservatives" who think their opinions outweigh reality these days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

When I was the program manager of OASIS, a mine sweeping project, I read an estimate that Iran had somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 mines in warehouses near the straits of Hormuz. Given current mine technology vs sweeping and active elimination techniques this could permanently close the straits. The best approach would be to hit those mines before they leave the warehouses. Even ten mines might effectively close the straits as insurance carriers would not underwrite the ships and the companies owning them wouldn’t allow them to sail.

On the other hand, closing off the straits and the mouth of the Red Sea might spur Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to make a deal with Israel to allow a pipeline across their country. Israel has, I’ve read, already offered to do this. The Arab countries, constrained by fifty years of their own propaganda, have thus far refused. But if these countries have to stop the payments to their citizens, which prevent a revolt, then they may relent and come up with some reason they can run their pipeline.

I have maintained that the first use of an Muslim owned nuclear weapon won’t be against Israel, it will be against another Muslim country. They hate and fear each other much more than they hate Israel. Reason being; They know Israel won’t attack unless they threaten them. But fellow Muslims may attack at any moment and for a made-up reason.


26 posted on 07/06/2018 3:46:23 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy
Sir, I understand and somewhat agree with you, but could you please dial it back a bit?

Asking is all that's gone on so far. The US has asked other countries to not buy from Ira.

That might not be possible for some due to their own contracts and national laws.

As to the Iranian military, the US Navy sank the Iranian Navy twice already. And while the MSM didn't report either occurrence in the 80’s and 90’s, a third time is well within the fleet assets currently in the gulf to handle again.

I personally believe that containment is the right approach, but it will take decades, just like the former USSR. Eventually the mullahs will fall.

27 posted on 07/06/2018 4:50:18 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
The mullahcracy is threatening other nations, including all the customers for oil, and their attacks would constitute an act of war -- except of course to the mullah worshippers. The Iranians are shouting "death to the dictator", and his turbaned head will be coming off if he tries some ****.

28 posted on 07/06/2018 5:29:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freeport

Absolutely incorrect. We told Western European banks we would sanction the banking.if they trade with Iran the way we don’t want them too. Not good!!


29 posted on 07/06/2018 10:50:51 AM PDT by raiderboy (Trump has assured us that he will shut down the government to get the WALL in Sept.ith the solar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Get popcorn


30 posted on 07/06/2018 11:00:40 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson