Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Legal Analyst: Reasoning Behind Roe v. Wade ‘Shaky’
FinkelBlog ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 07/07/2018 9:27:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Could Danny Cevallos’ days at MSNBC be numbered? The question arises because he has–twice by my count–had the temerity to confound liberal thinking on Joy Reid’s show.

Back in February, we noted Cevallos gently explaining to Reid that her suggestion that payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal could be “bribes” was wrong.

If that was a gutsy thing for Cevallos to do, he took things a giant step further today. For many liberals, abortion is the ultimate issue, and Roe v. Wade the sacred cow. But Cevallos had the audacity to flatly assert:

“Anyone–people on both sides would agree that the reasoning behind Roe, it stands on shaky ground. It rests on the idea that the right to privacy inherent in an abortion emanates from the penumbra–it glows from the rights of the Constitution, even though it’s not explicitly in the text.”

Get the rest of the story and view the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblogger.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; belongsinbloggers; brettkavanaugh; clickbait; dannycevallos; genderdysphoria; getajob; globalwarminghoax; homosexualagenda; joyreid; liberalterians; libertarians; maga; medicalmarijuana; roevwade; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: skimbell

Precedent, said to be sacred by leftists in regards to stuff they made up, is said to be irrelevant in regards to stuff that is actually in the Constitution.


21 posted on 07/07/2018 10:41:02 AM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Multiple states would ban abortion in a substantial number of circumstances.


22 posted on 07/07/2018 10:42:45 AM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Casey is the prevailing pro-abortion decision, however, Roe remains a convenient way to refer to all pro-abortion decisions.


23 posted on 07/07/2018 10:47:39 AM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Leaving aside all the political tumult it caused and any moral considerations, Roe v Wade was possibly THE least well-reasoned, most ill-informed decision ever to come out of that court. Had it not caused so much damage for decades now, it would be laughable.


24 posted on 07/07/2018 10:50:37 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No kidding

Right to privacy argument

It should have stayed up to the states like weed

I’d prefer completely outlawed but just overturning Roe would be excellent


25 posted on 07/07/2018 10:51:59 AM PDT by wardaddy (Hanged not hung.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The reasoning that the Right to Privacy translates into Slaughtering a six-month-old baby by crushing his or her skull, escapes me.


26 posted on 07/07/2018 10:53:01 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Somebody help me here, can't it be found in the “penumbra” of the Founding Fathers that they certainly did not support abortion and therefor never consider it to be a Constitutional right?
27 posted on 07/07/2018 11:01:05 AM PDT by GonzoII ("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"It rests on the idea that the right to privacy inherent in an abortion emanates from the penumbra..."

Just great. Now Joy and her gaggle of loons are going to want to wear Penumbra hats! First they came for my vagina... Don't be touchin' my penumbra now!!!

28 posted on 07/07/2018 11:01:10 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Avalon

“Multiple states would ban abortion in a substantial number of circumstances.”

Yes that is true but no state will outright ban first
trimester abortions and you can take it to the bank. Besides Roberts is not going to vote to overturn RvW you take that to the bank too.


29 posted on 07/07/2018 11:06:00 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Ron Paul’s 2005 Sanctity of Life bill nukes abortion at the federal level and returns it to the states. No SCOTUS needed.


30 posted on 07/07/2018 11:13:20 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy: The cliff's edge of Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Sounds like Danny’s auditioning for FOX.


31 posted on 07/07/2018 11:20:33 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“They also like to redefine words when legislating.”

You mean, like, marriage?


32 posted on 07/07/2018 11:41:48 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Who’s the other?


33 posted on 07/07/2018 12:28:24 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

You are wrong.

Some states would ban abortion from conception forward.

Take that to the bank.


34 posted on 07/07/2018 1:12:38 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

LOL - not telling. I don’t want to look like a fan...


35 posted on 07/07/2018 1:28:33 PM PDT by GOPJ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
"...the Supreme Court, even with the substitution of a Trump appointee for Justice Kennedy, is unlikely to overturn it [Roe v. Wade] given the court’s respect for precedent..."

This isn't a good talking point all of a sudden. In the last two or three weeks, the Supreme Court effectively overturned Korematsu vs United States (Japanese internment) and Abood vs Detroit Board of Education (compulsory union dues), and via Carpenter vs United States (cell tower records) has put Smith vs Maryland (phone call records), United States vs Miller (bank records), and Katz vs United States (the so-called bogus "third party doctrine") on a much shorter leash.

36 posted on 07/07/2018 2:44:36 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Except the declaration has no power of law. It’s just a nice letter to the King.


37 posted on 07/07/2018 2:47:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Roe v Wade was possibly THE least well-reasoned, most ill-informed decision ever to come out of that court.

Indeed. May I suggest to any whipper-snappers that this article is a good start on the specifics of why it's a bad decision:

https://nypost.com/2018/07/06/why-roe-v-wade-is-a-travesty-of-constitutional-law/

38 posted on 07/07/2018 2:48:31 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

As I have been saying the LEFT is so afraid of RvW being overturned because it is extra constitutional and the LEFT knows it.


39 posted on 07/07/2018 3:26:36 PM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing and we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

Brown v Board of Education broke precedent.

You bolster your argument with precedent when you agree with the precedent. Otherwise, no.

The only thing that matters is its adherence to the Constitution.


40 posted on 07/07/2018 3:32:42 PM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing and we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson