Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Kavanaugh

Posted on 07/09/2018 6:13:04 PM PDT by dirtboy

Trump nominates Kavenaugh


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bk; breaking; livescotusnominee; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-267 next last
To: dirtboy

I trust Donald, but this guy looks and smells RINO/Deep State.


81 posted on 07/09/2018 6:42:59 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Found this on Twitter: https://twitter.com/brianefallon/status/1016493063332663297 "Kavanaugh: ✔️ Praised *dissent* in Roe ✔️ Criticized Roberts ruling on Obamacare ✔️ Says sitting POTUS can't be indicted/can fire special counsel whenever he wants ✔️ Opposes net neutrality ✔️ Opposes consumer bureau ✔️ Says assault weapon bans are unconstitutional"
82 posted on 07/09/2018 6:43:10 PM PDT by SweetPatriot84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Kavanaugh noted, “the Supreme Court held”.

That is not a legal argument for an appelate judge. It might be for a plaintiff or a defendent, but a judge hearing the case. His guard IS NOT Supreme Court precedents, it is the specific law and HIS OWN READING OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Don’t look to “Conservative” Kavenaugh to go overturning any SCOTUS precedents. To him they are as gold as the Constitution. A real Bush family hero.


83 posted on 07/09/2018 6:44:04 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

No he isn’t

Did you listen to him?

His fidelity to the constitution is without question


84 posted on 07/09/2018 6:44:20 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Has to be realistic but with Rand Paul saying he’s a no, don’t see how he passes.


85 posted on 07/09/2018 6:44:39 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SweetPatriot84
According to this, Kavanaugh is more conservative than Gorsuch and almost as conservative as Thomas.


86 posted on 07/09/2018 6:45:10 PM PDT by SamAdams76 ( Have you eaten your bone marrow today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Head and shoulders better than the wise latina or Harriet Myers.

I still can't believe that stupid chimp chose her. Insane.

87 posted on 07/09/2018 6:45:25 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

Hopefully this will be President Trump’s “Harriet Miers” moment...


88 posted on 07/09/2018 6:45:37 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LIBERALS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Who wants to bet on ALL important decisions, TRUMP checks on Ann Coulter's Twitter page before making the final decision?




89 posted on 07/09/2018 6:45:47 PM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: El Cid
although I was partial to Judge Amy Barrett

Hopefully RBG will die soon and you'll get your wish

90 posted on 07/09/2018 6:46:09 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
Has to be realistic but with Rand Paul saying he’s a no, don’t see how he passes.

Pence casts the tie-breaking vote.

91 posted on 07/09/2018 6:47:07 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

“Why never a Methodist?”

Too hard to find a Methodist who believes in God?


92 posted on 07/09/2018 6:47:23 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
My prediction. He will not pass the vote.

He'll pass. He's a weak pick and the democrats won't risk a fight that might leave them stuck with a real constitutionalist. They'll whine, but they'll confirm.

93 posted on 07/09/2018 6:47:27 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“You think Trump’s salty and funny oratory is in any way comparable to that bland little parent-pleasing performance?”

That response is a non sequiter to my point, which is he went with a populist approach.


94 posted on 07/09/2018 6:47:37 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (Trump: America First. Obama: Quran First. Clintons: Our Money First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

“He’s a weak pick and the democrats won’t risk a fight that might leave them stuck with a real constitutionalist.”

If I were a Democrat, I would be having a giant party. This guy will pass easily.


95 posted on 07/09/2018 6:48:45 PM PDT by Luke21 (The Hill sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

She was attacking others on immigration. Kavanaugh was Coulter’s choice.


96 posted on 07/09/2018 6:49:39 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Re: 90

Here’s hoping that the ancient Commie, RBG, retires soon.

97 posted on 07/09/2018 6:49:59 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

With McCain out, Rand Paul voting with the Demonrats makes it 49-50 against. No tie for Pence to break.


98 posted on 07/09/2018 6:50:10 PM PDT by bIlluminati (Defund the Left. Shrink the U.S. Federal government to 1897 levels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Incorrect. A lower court judge must comply - or at least pretend to comply - with higher court rulings. A lower court judge, for example, cannot currently rule that homosexual marriage is a travesty and has no constitutional protection. It just doesn’t work that way.


99 posted on 07/09/2018 6:50:28 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

agree. there are bad precedents(not adhering to the USC) and good precedents(ahering). The good decision is one in line with the Constitution.

Brown v Board of Educ overturned precedent. I wish someone would ask Collins about this. But she only seems to talk to the LEFT.


100 posted on 07/09/2018 6:51:46 PM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing and we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson