Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Rosenstein asks prosecutors to help review Kavanaugh documents
Axios ^ | 11 Jul 2018 | Khorri Atkinson

Posted on 07/11/2018 4:41:43 PM PDT by mandaladon

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has asked the offices of all 93 U.S. attorneys to each provide up to three federal prosecutors to assist the Justice Department in reviewing government records of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the New York Times reports, citing a letter it obtained.

Why it matters: The Times notes that this is an unusual move because department attorneys are not typically responsible for carrying out such a task. "The production of documents could slow down a confirmation hearing that has already shaped up as a sharp partisan battle. Democratic lawmakers say they want to inspect all of Judge Kavanaugh’s documents, including his staff work and over 300 opinions he has issued as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit," the report notes.

Show less What they're saying: Former law enforcement officials told the Times that Rosenstein's request is troubling.

"It’s flat-out wrong to have career federal prosecutors engaged in a political process like the vetting of a Supreme Court nominee. It takes them away from the mission they’re supposed to be fulfilling, which is effective criminal justice enforcement," Christopher Hunter, a former F.B.I. agent and federal prosecutor for almost 11 years, told the publication.

But Michael Zubrensky, a former Justice Department lawyer who oversaw the agency's Office of Legal Policy, said Kavanaugh's long paper trail could be the reason for Rosenstein's request. Sarah Isgur Flores, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, told the Times that prosecutors have been used in the past to vet Supreme Court nominees. "[T]he scope of the production of executive branch documents we’ve been asked for is many, many times as large," she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at axios.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; brettkavanaugh; election2018; election2020; jamescomey; kavanaugh; lisabarsoomian; maga; michaelcohen; michaelzubrensky; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; presidenttrump; rodrosenstein; sarahisgurflores; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: mandaladon

I completely give up on the hope that Sessions will ever take a stand against these people. Rosenstein has been running the “justice” department since Day One.


21 posted on 07/11/2018 4:51:49 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Fire Rodentweasel!


22 posted on 07/11/2018 4:51:54 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Rosenstein is assisting Sessions in draining the swamp.

This move means nothing and has happened to other SCOTUS nominations as well.

23 posted on 07/11/2018 4:52:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy: The cliff's edge of Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

If Trump didn’t want him doing this, it wouldn’t be done.


24 posted on 07/11/2018 4:52:56 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

> “NYT: Rosenstein asks prosecutors to help review Kavanaugh documents”

WTF?

Is this routine> I have never seen DOJ do this to a SCOTUS nominee. Maybe I wasn’t paying attention.

But this is NY Times so we know there’s politics behind it somewhere.


25 posted on 07/11/2018 4:54:06 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Is Mueller investigating him already ?


26 posted on 07/11/2018 4:54:16 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

Did RR do these same vetting processes for the unwise Latina and Kagan??


27 posted on 07/11/2018 4:54:40 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

And just how is Rosenstein the one in the DOJ to make any decisions concerning a SCOTUS nominee?


28 posted on 07/11/2018 4:57:01 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Kavanaugh -> Starr-> Clinton???


29 posted on 07/11/2018 4:58:15 PM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

This should not be permitted.

Why would POTUS allow him to get away with this?


30 posted on 07/11/2018 4:59:37 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Closely resembles a well known, non-acting AG.


31 posted on 07/11/2018 5:02:07 PM PDT by Paladin2 (no spelchek, no problem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

So the DOJ and FBI are essentially STILL being run by the Obama Administration and Clinton loyalists. It’s absolutely unconscionable.


32 posted on 07/11/2018 5:04:03 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Rosenstein is assisting Sessions in draining the swamp. “

Trump just dope-slapped those two weasels with the Hammond pardons.


33 posted on 07/11/2018 5:05:09 PM PDT by Paladin2 (no spelchek, no problem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

His happens for all SC nominees who have executive branch records like Kavanaugh. The DOJ has to review those records for, among other things, privileged communications. Kavanaugh worked in the Bush Administration as staff secretary and has extensive records that need to be reviewed before released to the senate committee.


34 posted on 07/11/2018 5:10:20 PM PDT by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Why does no one even suggest that Trump might have ORDERED this so as to not have ANY surprises during the Senate hearings? After all Judge Kavanaugh has one of the longest paper trails in nomination history.


35 posted on 07/11/2018 5:13:11 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

He’s happy to have an excuse not to produce the documents the Congress has demanded.


36 posted on 07/11/2018 5:13:23 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Who does this cluck work for?
****************************

The Deep State


37 posted on 07/11/2018 5:15:40 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shanover

Yup.


38 posted on 07/11/2018 5:18:44 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This has nothing to do with Russia so why is Rosenstein doing this and not Session? Is Sessions dead?


39 posted on 07/11/2018 5:36:37 PM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

What role does the FBI have, unless requested?

Couln’t Sessions head Rosie away?

Say Hey, Rosie. I’ll handle this one.


40 posted on 07/11/2018 5:39:15 PM PDT by truth_seeker ( \/**|_|**\/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson