Posted on 07/13/2018 5:14:10 AM PDT by Zakeet
If the corrupt Democrats in the FBI and the DOJ have nothing to hide in the investigation of their attempted coup against Donald Trump, then why did their congressional enablers attempt to hijack the FBI corruption hearing yesterday?
[Snip]
What the corrupt FIB, I mean FBI, and their fellow Democrat dirty tricksters in the Justice Department tried to do was first rig the 2016 presidential election and then, after that failed, tried to frame the new president.
Ask yourself this: Why don't the Democrats want to get to the bottom of this scandal that makes Watergate look like a spitball? A scandal with actual evidence and smoking guns, unlike the Russian collusion hoax.
[Snip]
Here's how corrupt the FBI now is: The disgraced Strzok was allowed to decide himself what evidence he would turn over in this ongoing probe of unprecedented corruption in the FBI. In other words, he didn't get any special treatment, he was handled exactly the same way the Democrat police state handled Hillary Clinton and James Comey.
Do you suppose the FBI let, say, Paul Manafort, or Michael Flynn or Michael Cohen decide what evidence they were going to turn over to Robert Mueller's 13 angry Democrats?
[Snip]
Peter Strzok is an arrogant, pampered puke who brags about his "26 years of defending our nation."
Defending our nation? Sharpening pencils, shuffling papers and chasing Lisa Page around the desk is defending our nation? Who knew?
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
How many times did you look so innocent into your wife's eyes and lie to her?
The Mob has more honor than these FBI schmucks.
Who ever thought we’d see Democrats defending law enforcement?
Why don’t the Democrats want to get to the bottom of this scandal that makes Watergate look like a spitball?
~~~~
This seems like an obvious and provocative question, but it gets to a very important point.
I think it can be rephrased like this?
WHAT ARE THE DEMOCRATS AFRAID OF?
If you think there is zero there there, then let the republicans trip all over themselves to look like fools.
The purpose of the hearing was so that the Republicans could play to their base and the Democrats could play to theirs. Both succeeded.
Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Che, Fidel, Angela Davis, Hillary, Bill, Al Franken . . .
The list is just off the top of my head. Criminals all. Why do Democrats so ardently defend criminals and set them up as their heroes?
(Because they are criminals themselves?)
FakeNewsMSM is worse than the Dems:
12 Jul: NY Post Editorial: Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless
Heck, The New York Times didnt even wait for him to say Word One before posting a story headlined, FBI Agent at Center of Russia Probe Turns Tables on GOP.
But then, the Times knew Strzok planned to say that the mere fact of his being questioned is a victory notch in Putins belt....
https://nypost.com/2018/07/12/peter-strzok-is-absolutely-shameless/
Stephen Colbert Makes Fun of ‘Intense’ House Hearing With Peter Strzok
New York Times-3 hours ago
Why Peter Strzok Wanted to Testify
New York Times-2 hours ago
Strzok: Russian interference source was credible
CNN-17 hours ago
Peter Strzok defends himself at House hearing
CNN-11 hours ago
Peter Strzok Defends Anti-Trump Tweets
HuffPost-18 hours ago
The Peter Strzok fiasco wrecks the GOP’s bogus conspiracy theory
Blog-Washington Post-18 hours ago
FBI agent Peter Strzok defends his work and the FBI
Washington Post-21 hours ago
Fmr. GOP Rep. on Strzok hearing: ‘Terrible day for Republicans’
MSNBC-8 hours ago
Former Republican congressman David Jolly reacts
Dem: Strzok hearing was about political theater
CNN-11 hours ago
Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) tells CNN’s Anderson Cooper he believes Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee were using FBI agent Peter Strzok
He should have, at the very least, directed the Sgt. At Arms to remove the placard holders from the room and/or toss them into the Capitol Building's jail cell.
The GOP lawmakers are a bunch of feckless pussies.
“Who ever thought wed see Democrats defending law enforcement?”
When its “their” law enforcement.
I miss “the hammer”.
Sort of.... in the hearing yesterday, they weren't really 'ardently defending a criminal'. They were protecting and running subterfuge for one of the members of their mob enterprise.
That one of the best lines to come out of the pathetic hearing.
Pfl
His carrier needs a thorough review.
Mr Creepy
He’s one creepy guy
They only succeeded with the Dems if they did not watch any of the hearing(which is impossible for those on any social media). Anyone that still had some sanity left on the left and saw that performance would be horrified. That was a man you avoid with all cost even if he were on your team. If you had to deal with him closely you dealt with him with extreme caution....that came across loud and clear. That performance was completely unwatchable and I really wanted to watch it. I lasted only a few minutes.
The most completely bizarre moments of his performance are all over social media. Even Dems can not escape how badly he and the Dems came off, even if the MSM refuse to showcase any of the times he comes of horribly.
The % of high functioning sociopaths that seek careers in Washington in politics and the alphabet agencies for the power they can wield is probably very high. Supposedly DOJ campaign contributions went to Clinton by 97% in 2016. The FBI has 35,000 employees and a budget of almost 9 billion they deign to tell us about. It was probably too late to do anything about it 50 years ago, can’t see anything changing the culture now.
But we know the vast majority of the FBI are true patriots and strive to perform their duties with honor. We know this because they constantly repeat it.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.