I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that you have not read the 49 page indictment yet. assuming I'm correct in that guess, I'd be really interested in your opinion after you do so.
Here is is: Justice.Gov: USA vs. (list of 12 Russians with very long names)
I have read it, all 49 pages.
There is way too much specific information to support the alternative theory that it was all an inside job. For instance, the DCLeaks web site is traced to the Russians, they have evidence of penetration of dozens of computers in the DCCC.
I don't think it's plausible that they made all this stuff up, it's just too specific. Names, dates, addresses, programs used to hack things, names of people whose accounts were cracked, etc.
So, re-calibrate your opinions based on new evidence, if you can.
There is no proof submitted that Trump or anyone on his team had anything to do with this. It was a GRU (Russian military intelligence) operation, top to bottom. That actually seems to make it *less likely* that Trump or anyone on his team was in any way involved.
Maybe, just maybe I could believe that some misguided fellow like Roger Stone got involved with Romanian hackers or something, but this was clearly a pro hacking job run from big spy buildings in Russia.
it's sort of funny to indict GRU spies for doing spying. They are doing their job, after all. And we have buildings full of our own DIA, CIA and NSA spies hacking into Russian servers every day to get the same sort of stuff.
But: we would never use that information to interfere in Russian politics or elections.
Ha ha ha ha ha.