same question i ask the day the indictments were announced
Posted on 07/16/2018 5:31:00 PM PDT by Stayfree
Did Carnac the Magnificent on Johnny Carson see the writing on the question cards before he gave his psychic replies?
No.
FBI don’t gotta see no stinkin’ server, either.
Ask Seth rich what happened
Today I spoke with several colleagues who were with Main Justice at times in the past, and posed this very the question. Their response was that one could be prosecuted for hacking the DNC unless the government inspected the computers AND let the defense share in the independent findings as part of the discovery process. It would be like allowing a victim in a criminal case to do its own DNA test, and allowing the only DNA evidence come from the party affiliated expert, with no independent analysis from the government or the defense.
How does the DOJ respond when Russia wants to see the proof? We are waaaay past the point where even the American people just believe what they tell us. There better be some hard evidence. Without hands on the server and multiple forensic examiners testimony, this is just more deep state crap.
I don’t do criminal law and I understand the 12 will never stand trial but the admissibility of a 3rd party assessment seems doubtful to me
Exactly it would be inadmissible
On Tucker Carlson tonight I heard the DNC has destroyed all of their servers.
Was it not our FBI that allowed Hillary’s staff to keep their computers and phones without being inspected by the FBI?
Did not Hillary bleach her server even after a Congressional order to preserve data?
These are the reasons the American Public is having major problems believing Washington DC political hacks.
Trump is standing with the American Public and is using his power to force corrupt people to face sunlight.
The devil screams when exposed to sunlight.
same question i ask the day the indictments were announced
Good question...
So were the DNC servers. The “hack” was likely Seth Rich downloading information from inside the network. I saw an article last year that analyzed the metadata of the files downloaded and the speed of the downloads was not possible over the internet.
Typical Democrats. Hanging first, trial later.
There is the old saying a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, meaning a grand jury can be persuaded to indict anyone. In the case of the Russians, there will be no extradition, there will be no trials. Mueller will not have to present his case in front of judge or jury where ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ would apply. The indictments are worthless and only for show.
They are Deep State criminals who consider themselves above the law and that's my final answer, Regis!
Yes, especially since the FBI indicted no one. The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian...
I read somewhere that the FBI is reopening the Lincoln assasination investigation based on new evidence.
Well, with the current batch of idiots in charge, it could happen....
Yes, vault 7 from wikileaks has the details. I believe it falls under the UMBRIDGE subtrafuse program.
All they are doing is creating the appearance of evidence to impeach Trump. They don’t need any real evidence to get that dirty deed done.
Great question ... you would think an average genius journalist would ask such a question.
A better question is why did the DNC not permit the FBI to inspect their servers? The real answer is it would have uncovered other criminal activity ... maybe a lot more criminal activity.
Look on youtube for the Sunday Morning Futures interview by Maria Bartiroma of Fox with Devin Nunes. His statements are VERY relevant to this thread and question - the house GOP intel report that was mocked by the media and democrats had even MORE information in it than the indictment. The basis for this indictment has been known for over 18 months! There is also another bombshell that Nunes pointed out about the recent indictment - it did not mention that the hacking efforts were also deployed against the GOP server and targets. In other words - both political parties were targeted, but the recent indictment and press conference fails to mention this.
That alone tells you everything you need to know.
It turns out to be more complicated than that. While such speed may not be available to a Romanian hacker using an international internet connection, it might be available to a hacker using or connected to a computer located near Washington D.C. with a high-speed cable or fiber connection, provided that the DNC also used such a high speed connection. D.C. leads the nation in high speed internet.
However, it is important to note that the speeds found by Forensicator, 23MB/sec for mixed size files and 38MB/sec for large files, are exactly what you would expect for transferring files from a modern computer to a USB2 thumb drive.
There is more to this story than data transfer speed. For more info, read the articles here: https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.