Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush-appointed Judge Announces End to National Borders, Suspends Deportations
Conservative Review ^ | July 16, 2018 | Daniel Horowitz

Posted on 07/17/2018 6:23:38 AM PDT by ManHunter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Georgia Girl 2
"At what point does Trump just say “no”? He needs to tell this judge “see you at the Supremes”"

and announce deportations will continue at full speed.

21 posted on 07/17/2018 7:12:52 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ManHunter

All Congress needs to do is repeal all civil service laws protecting executive branch employees from being fired.

Then executive branch employees can be simply told: “ignore this bozo, or be out on the street by the afternoon”.


22 posted on 07/17/2018 7:18:22 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (“It rubs the rainbow on it’s skin or it gets the diversity again!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainPhilFan
THEN WHY IN THE HELL HAVE THEY BEEN ALLOWED TO HOLD THIS POWER?

Because Congress WANTS judges to be issuing the orders that the Deep State desires, but which elected legislators don't want to touch because the voters won't like it.

23 posted on 07/17/2018 7:20:52 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (“It rubs the rainbow on it’s skin or it gets the diversity again!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Trump can ignore these Judges but he doesn’t


24 posted on 07/17/2018 7:32:28 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

He can’t because the Left and their lapdog Mediots would have a field day.........


25 posted on 07/17/2018 7:33:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No bush is a conservative.
They are all lying weasels.
Big gub mint a-holes


26 posted on 07/17/2018 7:36:33 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (Criminals at F.B.I., Justice Dept, I.R.S and No one taken out in cuffs? Federal gub mint is crappola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

“The only reasonable explanation for both Democrat and Republican factions being consumed with stopping nearly every Trump initiative is that both parties are determined that any person that is not an approved member of the ruling elite shall not sit in the Oval Office. “

Yes the swamp would rather see our country devastated financially and morally than continue to have an outsider in the White House.


27 posted on 07/17/2018 7:49:06 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Justice Thomas had an interesting concurrence in the recent "Trump vs. Hawaii" immigration case...

Merits aside, I write separately to address the remedy that the plaintiffs sought and obtained in this case. The District Court imposed an injunction that barred the Government from enforcing the President’s Proclamation against anyone, not just the plaintiffs. Injunctions that prohibit the Executive Branch from applying a law or policy against anyone—often called “universal” or “na- tionwide” injunctions—have become increasingly com- mon.1 District courts, including the one here, have begun imposing universal injunctions without considering their authority to grant such sweeping relief. These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system— preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.

I am skeptical that district courts have the authority to enter universal injunctions. These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.

Unfortunately, this case will be moot before the new term starts in October, but I'm sure we'll have similar cases come along. Perhaps the court could take up Thomas' concerns.

28 posted on 07/17/2018 8:59:14 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Yes the swamp would rather see our country devastated financially and morally than continue to have an outsider in the White House.

Of course they would.

It is about power at that level and never about what is good for the country.

The downsides of their policies never affect them. Just like ObamaCare specifically exempted them. And when their staffers were required to pay the same as everyone else a way was found to reimburse them for that cost.

Those on the inside are not to be harmed. Everyone else is fair game. And those on the outside are not permitted to enter unless deemed worthy. Trump did not pay his dues and skipped the vetting process. He must be expunged or at least he must not be permitted to succeed.

29 posted on 07/17/2018 9:34:30 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
Because we the people elect cowards that are more interested in reelection than doing their job.

But they're such smooth talkers! And sharp dressers!

(do I really need a sarc tag?)

30 posted on 07/17/2018 9:41:36 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Wonderful theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
But they're such smooth talkers! And sharp dressers!

I could dress real smart too if I was exempted from insider trading laws and was privy before the fact of what defense contractor were going to get contracts.

31 posted on 07/17/2018 9:45:08 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Yep.


32 posted on 07/17/2018 10:40:17 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
In remarks intended to address those Republicans joining in today's storm of Leftist hysteria, I offered a somewhat different interpretation. This goes way beyond any form of snobbery--much more insidious:

War On An American Future.

What Drives The Trump Haters

33 posted on 07/17/2018 10:51:53 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Did not SCOTUS definitely rule two weeks ago, via the travel ban, that deporation and immigration authority rests solely with the POTUS? Trunp ought to tell the judge to shove it under the robe, and then proceed to direct ICE to refocus on stopping migrant flow at the border. Let the judge enforce his order, or Congress change the law.

This BS has to stop. Defy the legislative branch, Mr. President. You have the Articles of Power to do so in this case


34 posted on 07/17/2018 12:24:45 PM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: confederatecarpetbag
Defy the legislative branch, Mr. President.

You mean the Judicial Branch?.................

35 posted on 07/17/2018 12:51:14 PM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
People will note “Bush-appointed judge” without noting that the presidential power to name judges is limited when the Senate is not on board. Thanks to the Reid Rule, that’s not a problem now for Trump - provided he has a simple majority in the Senate.

Bush didn’t have that advantage - but considering what we now know, maybe that wouldn’t have made a difference in this case.

36 posted on 07/17/2018 1:09:57 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

yes, thanks. Fingers ahead of brain. Judicial is correct


37 posted on 07/17/2018 1:37:46 PM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

There are around 650+ lower federal court judges. They’re getting in the groove of assuming executive branch powers. Congress will do nothing.


38 posted on 07/17/2018 2:16:27 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson