Attorney-Client privilege seems to mean nothing to liberals.
Not good for Cohen’s client base if they learn it means nothing to him.
I don;t care if Trump had sex with her or not OR if he paid her. He still was a better choice than the former rapist-in-chief’s shrill witch wife.
I don’t believe the public would see a payment to a hooker as grounds to remove a sitting president, especially since we’re talking about a consensual event that took place over a decade ago.
Yes, it’s a violation of the law. No, I don’t see it as an infraction that would be impeachment worthy. Folks would laugh at that.
As for paying her, in return for her not telling the story, how would that be a campaign violation?
If Hillary hiring P.I.s to intimidate and silence women Bill Clinton had assaulted, raped, or beaten up wasn’t a problem, then it’s a laugh to think this would be for Trump.
Since this can’t be used to remove Trump, it’s only purpose would be to try and split up his marriage. The party that screams about what people to in their private lives should be their business, sure outs themselves here.
This is what I reference when I say that Melania Trump has put aside her personal feelings, to be the best First Lady she can be.
She is making it look like she has a good relationship with her husband. I hope she does. What I do know is that she could have made a big deal out of this publicly, but she opted to put it aside for the betterment of the nation.
What a class act.