Skip to comments.
Elizabeth Warren eyes 50% tax rate, says Dems will end Trump tax cuts if they take back Congress
Biz Pac Review ^
| July 25, 2018
| Samantha Chang
Posted on 07/25/2018 7:25:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How exactly are they going to change tax law without the signature of the President? Did they forget about that part
To: Amendment10
Not to mention the wording in the
5th amendment:
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
And the 14th amendment:
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
With respect to illegal aliens.
42
posted on
07/25/2018 8:37:08 PM PDT
by
Lean-Right
(Eat More Moose)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The GOP has campaign ad material in truckloads with these lunatics. And they have this one on video.
43
posted on
07/25/2018 8:39:59 PM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
To: rb22982
The shareholders pay the taxes, but the corporate taxes are already collected before the share holders get their dividends So they’re taxes twice. Since all corporations are owned by individuals ie shareholders, then business taxes are just the government double dipping in the public trough
44
posted on
07/25/2018 8:41:49 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: rb22982
Nope. The end consumer pays all costs of a product whether it be taxes, labor, materials, shipping, everything. You are talking about internal cost structure where things can be moved around all over.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hey it worked for Clinton. Hammered G.H.W. Bush for raising taxes, promised a middle class tax cut, 6 months later claimed he worked hard but couldn’t make the tax cut work so he raised taxes retroactively instead.
46
posted on
07/25/2018 8:43:40 PM PDT
by
shotgun
( .)
To: precisionshootist
That is factually incorrect. Tax reform cut business cost massively this year as did dereg. Why is CPI higher TTM than TTM 1 year ago
47
posted on
07/25/2018 8:45:07 PM PDT
by
rb22982
To: lgjhn23
Better question is who the hell would go to work.
48
posted on
07/25/2018 8:47:29 PM PDT
by
enduserindy
(IÂ’m done explaining basic math and the definition of freedom.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They don’t mind taxing the cr@p out of businesses...because, after all, “You didn’t build that.”
49
posted on
07/25/2018 8:51:15 PM PDT
by
gogeo
(No justice, no peace.)
To: from occupied ga
50
posted on
07/25/2018 8:53:21 PM PDT
by
enduserindy
(IÂ’m done explaining basic math and the definition of freedom.)
To: from occupied ga
Yes, it is double taxation, but that is irrelevant as to who ultimately bears the taxes (or what % of the tax). But some of the tax is born by management, not just shareholders. Personally, I’d implement a 15% across the board tariff on imports and eliminate corporate tax.
51
posted on
07/25/2018 8:56:11 PM PDT
by
rb22982
To: ealgeone
52
posted on
07/25/2018 8:58:11 PM PDT
by
the_daug
To: E. Pluribus Unum
a 50% to 90% personal income tax rate for Americans That'll work. Give that girl lots of camera time.
53
posted on
07/25/2018 8:59:44 PM PDT
by
meadsjn
To: DannyTN
The democratic platform is taking shape. Taxes of 50 to 90%
Open Borders
Elimination of ICE
Gay everything
Probably free trade without reciprocity, if for no other reason than to be anti-Trump
Socialism
You left off:
Confiscation of all weapons from the citizens.
54
posted on
07/25/2018 9:02:53 PM PDT
by
Natty Bumppo@frontier.net
(We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
To: CatOwner
[Who in their right mind would vote for a 50-90% personal income tax rate?]
Teater hang ups.
55
posted on
07/25/2018 9:03:27 PM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
To: Col Frank Slade
Warren just had her Mondale moment. I think you misspelled "Early Onset Dementia."
56
posted on
07/25/2018 9:05:21 PM PDT
by
Natty Bumppo@frontier.net
(We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Keep talking Lizzie. You say all the right things. 8>)
To: Billthedrill
I agree. They should run on it for the midterms too...
58
posted on
07/25/2018 9:13:34 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4 STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gee, why didn't she just say, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”? Tax the upper crust so the “poor” have more than crumbs. Obama just admitted in his South Africa speech that he doesn't need endless millions to live on, no one does. That was the day it was announced he and his two wives purchased their rental for $8mil. These communists will rue the day their idle dreams come true. Because the first people done away with are the leadership. That's the real definition of “dog eat dog”.
59
posted on
07/25/2018 9:22:35 PM PDT
by
The Westerner
(Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I hope she runs on this platform.
This is what a socialist looks like. Cant run away from it advocating 50-90% tax rates.
60
posted on
07/25/2018 10:06:40 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson