Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate quietly votes to cut tariffs on hundreds of Chinese goods (1,660)
Reuters via CNBC ^ | July 28, 2018

Posted on 07/27/2018 5:53:27 AM PDT by Pinkbell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Pinkbell

President Trump can and should veto this and we the people must vote out the RINOs, every last one.


21 posted on 07/27/2018 6:18:31 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

So well put. Few people have their eyes open.


22 posted on 07/27/2018 6:19:13 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Those thoughts go through my mind, and I’m sure the mind of many other people.

What a wasted opportunity...


23 posted on 07/27/2018 6:20:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I believe Trump is right in this regard: Unilateral reduction of tarrifs is nothing other than “feel good” legislation. A bunch of congress critters get to pat themeselves on the back, telling themselves they are “promoting free trade”. They are not promoting free trade.

One sided actions do not promot free trade, and lowering our tarrif barriers, all by ourselves, does not induce any other nation to unilaterally do the same. Why? Our unulateral action gives them no incentive to lower any of their tarrifs.

Trump finally used the word I have been repoeating in WSJ and here for years, when it comes to what we need in trade - reciprocity. We need nation-by-nation agreements that are reciprocal, of reciprocal benefits to each.

Our stupid congress critters just said “our shores are open, whether yours are or not”.

Trump should veto the bill.


24 posted on 07/27/2018 6:21:23 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Another example why I am willing to contribute to President Trump’s campaign, but NOT to the GOP. The “Never Trumpers” have gone underground, but still control the GOP.


25 posted on 07/27/2018 6:23:03 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ('DEPLORABLE' Charter Member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - and DAMN Proud of it!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
Thanks JerseyDvl.
26 posted on 07/27/2018 6:23:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Having the Democrats, the Media, and the RINOs doing this stuff while Trump is navigating these waters is like trying to negotiate a price for a house, and your spouse is in the third seat (while negotiations are going on) saying “Honey...I REALLY want this house. I LIKE this house. Can’t we just buy it?”

The seller is just going to bide their time, because they know you are going to lose because your bargaining power and position is weak with your spouse there.

Chinese Jade merchants would often initially reveal a piece they were selling to a customer and study their pupils as the customer saw the piece for the first time. Dilatation of the pupils of the eye is an involuntary response to seeing something desirable. If they saw your pupils dilate, they knew you liked the piece, and that gave them valuable information when bargaining.

Here, they just read the news accounts and get the same information.


27 posted on 07/27/2018 6:24:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

If we have true free trade without subsidies and tariffs no one gets to control the “tit for tat” and therefore no one gets any kickbacks or favors. Plain and simple!!!


28 posted on 07/27/2018 6:24:12 AM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Paying off their lobbyist handlers.


29 posted on 07/27/2018 6:28:52 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Of course the United States Congress is trying to undercut the President. They are completely anti-American and all they care about is their globalist masters. Look how quickly they’re able to pass bills like this with almost no one even mentioning it on t.v. Veto this crap (if they ever reconcile it) and make sure you tweet about this daily. Are these fools working for China?!?! The Democrats hate Trump so much they are now AGAINST taxing the Chinese. Let’s be clear. No one did anything until Trump came along and now suddenly everyone is an expert. They have no clue!


30 posted on 07/27/2018 6:30:07 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I believe Trump is right in this regard: Unilateral reduction of tarrifs is nothing other than “feel good” legislation. A bunch of congress critters get to pat themeselves on the back, telling themselves they are “promoting free trade”. They are not promoting free trade.

One sided actions do not promot free trade, and lowering our tarrif barriers, all by ourselves, does not induce any other nation to unilaterally do the same. Why? Our unulateral action gives them no incentive to lower any of their tarrifs.

Trump finally used the word I have been repoeating in WSJ and here for years, when it comes to what we need in trade - reciprocity. We need nation-by-nation agreements that are reciprocal, of reciprocal benefits to each.

Our stupid congress critters just said “our shores are open, whether yours are or not”.

Trump should veto the bill.


31 posted on 07/27/2018 6:31:41 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

These stupid traitors don’t want to listen to US. They each have a lobbyist in their pocket. These lying RINO’s had better beware of demoralizing us right before the mid-terms.


32 posted on 07/27/2018 6:33:17 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01

He should. If it passed unanimously, it would certainly be overridden in the Senate.

Don’t know what the House vote was, but I did not see this bill come out of the House.


33 posted on 07/27/2018 6:33:47 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

And once there are few if any domestic producers of a product in the US, the price of those imported products tends to be raised. In the past, there have been articles about vitamin C and other supplements made mostly in China and how the prices have been jacked up.


34 posted on 07/27/2018 6:36:12 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"..... Notice that it says these products aren't made here any longer because the companies moved their production overseas...to China and other cheap labor havens. This is the epitome of cowardice and lack of vision by our senate and house. Why did they move production overseas? Because those companies had huge tariffs on us and we had tiny tariffs or no tariffs on them. It made the company money to produce in China and get charged ZERO tariff and pay a small tariff to get their product back in the US. We shouldn't be eliminating those tariffs. We should be reversing the process. Place a huge tariff on the product to force those manufacturers to return back home and give jobs here and not over there. We are funding the Chinese military, Chinese nukes, Chinese missiles, N. Korean and Iranian nukes and missiles. These legislators are cowardly flimflam artists and shouldn't be in leadership positions."

Well said.

The globalist cabal in Washington has become fabulously wealthy trading out jobs in the USA to the Chinese.

Sit down and make a clear statement before the cameras Mr President telling the Congressman and Senators how disappointed you are that they would try to sneak this through without floor debate. Make the soon-to-be campaigning reps own this bit of treachery.

Force them to pass it over your veto with the light shining brightly upon them.

And if I'm not mistaken, the House has gone into a one month recess so the bill may indeed die in their absence?

35 posted on 07/27/2018 6:39:37 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Wait a minute. This bill - which would destroy more American jobs - passed both the Senate and House unanimously. Unanimously!

How can it be that not one single person - from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul - voted against it. This is very, very strange.


36 posted on 07/27/2018 6:40:45 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Yay Uniparty!


37 posted on 07/27/2018 6:42:52 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Trump should tell Congress:

“You better fully fund and authorize the wall if you think I’m going to sign this.”


38 posted on 07/27/2018 6:47:54 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
From an upthread posted today:

Report: Chinese Are ‘Awed’ by Trump’s ‘Skill as a Strategist and Tactician’

Breitbart ^ | 26 July 2018 | John Carney

Posted on 7/27/2018, 6:03:10 AM by BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Top officials and intellectuals in China are “awed’ by President Donald Trump’s “skill as a strategist and tactician,” according to co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations Mark Leonard.

Writing in the Financial Times, Leonard reports that on a recent trip to China many of those he spoke to said “that Mr Trump is the US first president for more than 40 years to bash China on three fronts simultaneously: trade, military and ideology.”

And the stupids in the Congress move to undercut "Donald the Strong" (nickname in China for our beloved President)

And Donald the Strong just got an agreement with Europe to join together to resist China on trade and tariff issues.

AND FOR THOSE THAT MISSED IT:

Larry Kudlow: E.U. now backs Trump's trade fight with China The Washington Times ^ | Thursday, July 26, 2018 | S.A. Miller

Posted on 7/26/2018, 11:04:27 AM by GonzoII

President Trump’s chief economic adviser said Thursday that European Union Commission President Jean Claude Juncker pledged to back the U.S. trade fight against China.

The commitment to take on China’s trade abuses was made as part of the breakthrough zero-tariff deal struck this week by Mr. Trump and Mr. Juncker, said Larry Kudlow, director of the president’s National Economic Council.

Game Set and Match to Donald the Strong.

39 posted on 07/27/2018 6:48:29 AM PDT by spokeshave2 (WWG1WGA.....Where we go one we go all....WWG1WGA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I just fired off emails to Senators Cruz and Cornyn asking them why they didn’t vote against this Senate bill.

Bunch of traitors.


40 posted on 07/27/2018 6:48:44 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson