Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Some domestic manufacturers have complained the bill would undercut their business by making it easier for rivals to bring in cheap foreign goods. They said the bill punished smaller firms that lack the ability to defend their interests in Washington.

The version of the bill that passed the House in January included 145 items that are made domestically, according to a Reuters analysis.

Quietly. There is a reason they did it quietly. Don't let them hide it. If you disagree with this bill, feel free to contact your representative so they can ignore you.

So it sounds like companies like Hamilton Beach can ship manufacturing overseas. Eventually, certain products won't be made domestically anymore. Then, because the product isn't made in the U.S., they can request lower tariffs. What a win. This encourages industries to ship jobs overseas.

Also, there are 145 companies on this list (one specific example is given further in the article) where the products are still made here.

Plus, they are doing this when Trump is trying to be tough and negotiate with China. They are undercutting his negotiations in my opinion because why else do it now? China must be laughing. They wouldn't do anything to benefit the U.S. during negotiations.

Maybe I'm wrong and Trump will support this, but if it was so popular, I think Trump would be touting it and the universal support it got. It's not. If he doesn't support it, it's either he signs it like he did with the Russian sanctions to avoid the veto override or he lets them override his veto. If he's opposed, I hope he just lets them override. He won't look weak. He'll look strong for opposition.

1 posted on 07/27/2018 5:53:27 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Pinkbell

Wouldn’t the house also need to pass it?


2 posted on 07/27/2018 5:55:07 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Interesting that President Trump hasn’t tweeted about this.


4 posted on 07/27/2018 5:58:27 AM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

This is a DIRECT challenge to the President’s authority. No surprise that most Republicans went along with choosing China over America. Traitors, all.


5 posted on 07/27/2018 6:00:05 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

The Republican Party just does not get it.

It never will.

In all my 67 years, I have never seen a party join the opposition party as one to go against the interests of the United States.

Trump now has Europe discussing zero teriffs, but evidently these braintrusts don’t want to see that with China.

It boggles the mind to watch McConnell and Ryan damage this nation the way they are.


8 posted on 07/27/2018 6:04:03 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Another Wall Street sponsored and written bill.


10 posted on 07/27/2018 6:05:59 AM PDT by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell
"Supporters of the bill have said it would boost the economy by getting rid of tariffs set up to protect industries that no longer exist in the United States."

I wonder if the reason that these industries no longer exist in the United States is because the Chinese put them out of business with slave labor and tariffs of their own. Inquiring minds want to know.

13 posted on 07/27/2018 6:10:53 AM PDT by Desron13 (Inside every progressive is a petty tyrant straining to break free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

If this becomes law, it will guarantee more US factories and jobs moving to China. The same lunacy practiced by our government for several decades.


14 posted on 07/27/2018 6:11:10 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell
"Supporters of the bill have said it would boost the economy by getting rid of tariffs set up to protect industries that no longer exist in the United States."

Those are the tariffs most needed then. As it is, those are dependencies on foreign, anti-U.S. nations that we don't need. They're a hole in our national security.


18 posted on 07/27/2018 6:16:18 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

“unanimously passed”

This sounds like one of those maneuvers where they use some tricky procedure to avoid accountability for their actions.


19 posted on 07/27/2018 6:17:01 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell; Jim Robinson
Among the beneficiaries are companies that have moved production offshore. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co, for example, would pay reduced tariffs on Chinese-made toaster ovens, steam irons and other household appliances it used to make domestically.

Notice that it says these products aren't made here any longer because the companies moved their production overseas...to China and other cheap labor havens.

This is the epitome of cowardice and lack of vision by our senate and house.

Why did they move production overseas? Because those companies had huge tariffs on us and we had tiny tariffs or no tariffs on them. It made the company money to produce in China and get charged ZERO tariff and pay a small tariff to get their product back in the US.

We shouldn't be eliminating those tariffs. We should be reversing the process. Place a huge tariff on the product to force those manufacturers to return back home and give jobs here and not over there.

We are funding the Chinese military, Chinese nukes, Chinese missiles, N. Korean and Iranian nukes and missiles. These legislators are cowardly flimflam artists and shouldn't be in leadership positions.

20 posted on 07/27/2018 6:17:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

President Trump can and should veto this and we the people must vote out the RINOs, every last one.


21 posted on 07/27/2018 6:18:31 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

I believe Trump is right in this regard: Unilateral reduction of tarrifs is nothing other than “feel good” legislation. A bunch of congress critters get to pat themeselves on the back, telling themselves they are “promoting free trade”. They are not promoting free trade.

One sided actions do not promot free trade, and lowering our tarrif barriers, all by ourselves, does not induce any other nation to unilaterally do the same. Why? Our unulateral action gives them no incentive to lower any of their tarrifs.

Trump finally used the word I have been repoeating in WSJ and here for years, when it comes to what we need in trade - reciprocity. We need nation-by-nation agreements that are reciprocal, of reciprocal benefits to each.

Our stupid congress critters just said “our shores are open, whether yours are or not”.

Trump should veto the bill.


24 posted on 07/27/2018 6:21:23 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Having the Democrats, the Media, and the RINOs doing this stuff while Trump is navigating these waters is like trying to negotiate a price for a house, and your spouse is in the third seat (while negotiations are going on) saying “Honey...I REALLY want this house. I LIKE this house. Can’t we just buy it?”

The seller is just going to bide their time, because they know you are going to lose because your bargaining power and position is weak with your spouse there.

Chinese Jade merchants would often initially reveal a piece they were selling to a customer and study their pupils as the customer saw the piece for the first time. Dilatation of the pupils of the eye is an involuntary response to seeing something desirable. If they saw your pupils dilate, they knew you liked the piece, and that gave them valuable information when bargaining.

Here, they just read the news accounts and get the same information.


27 posted on 07/27/2018 6:24:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

If we have true free trade without subsidies and tariffs no one gets to control the “tit for tat” and therefore no one gets any kickbacks or favors. Plain and simple!!!


28 posted on 07/27/2018 6:24:12 AM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Paying off their lobbyist handlers.


29 posted on 07/27/2018 6:28:52 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Of course the United States Congress is trying to undercut the President. They are completely anti-American and all they care about is their globalist masters. Look how quickly they’re able to pass bills like this with almost no one even mentioning it on t.v. Veto this crap (if they ever reconcile it) and make sure you tweet about this daily. Are these fools working for China?!?! The Democrats hate Trump so much they are now AGAINST taxing the Chinese. Let’s be clear. No one did anything until Trump came along and now suddenly everyone is an expert. They have no clue!


30 posted on 07/27/2018 6:30:07 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

I believe Trump is right in this regard: Unilateral reduction of tarrifs is nothing other than “feel good” legislation. A bunch of congress critters get to pat themeselves on the back, telling themselves they are “promoting free trade”. They are not promoting free trade.

One sided actions do not promot free trade, and lowering our tarrif barriers, all by ourselves, does not induce any other nation to unilaterally do the same. Why? Our unulateral action gives them no incentive to lower any of their tarrifs.

Trump finally used the word I have been repoeating in WSJ and here for years, when it comes to what we need in trade - reciprocity. We need nation-by-nation agreements that are reciprocal, of reciprocal benefits to each.

Our stupid congress critters just said “our shores are open, whether yours are or not”.

Trump should veto the bill.


31 posted on 07/27/2018 6:31:41 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

These stupid traitors don’t want to listen to US. They each have a lobbyist in their pocket. These lying RINO’s had better beware of demoralizing us right before the mid-terms.


32 posted on 07/27/2018 6:33:17 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Wait a minute. This bill - which would destroy more American jobs - passed both the Senate and House unanimously. Unanimously!

How can it be that not one single person - from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul - voted against it. This is very, very strange.


36 posted on 07/27/2018 6:40:45 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Trump should tell Congress:

“You better fully fund and authorize the wall if you think I’m going to sign this.”


38 posted on 07/27/2018 6:47:54 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson