Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge in Seattle blocks release of blueprints for 3D-printed guns
The Seattle Times ^ | Originally published July 31, 2018 at 3:25 pm Updated July 31, 2018 at 6:48 pm | Agueda Pacheco-Flores, Seattle Times staff reporter

Posted on 08/01/2018 5:52:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

U.S. District Court Judge Robert Lasnik in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order blocking the release of downloadable blueprints for 3D-printed firearms. Lasnik’s ruling comes a day after Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a suit challenging the Trump administration’s decision to allow the release of the blueprints.

A federal judge in Seattle has granted a temporary restraining order blocking a Texas man from releasing downloadable blueprints for 3D-printed plastic firearms.

U.S. District Court Judge Robert Lasnik’s ruling Tuesday comes a day after Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a suit challenging the Trump administration’s decision last month to allow Texas gun-rights advocate Cody Wilson to post the blueprints, saying the move would provide broad unregulated access to dangerous weapons.

Ferguson is the lead attorney general in the multistate lawsuit that was filed in federal courts in seven other states, including New York and Oregon, along with the District of Columbia.

The lawsuit challenges the outcome of a 2015 case that began in 2013 when Wilson, head of the nonprofit Defense Distributed, was found to have violated a federal law known as International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), after publishing downloadable plans for 3D-printed guns online. The files were downloaded more than 100,000 times.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3dprinting; acherrytreetoofar; banglist; blackrobedclown; dncjudicialactivist; fedjudgepresident; jailforjudges; juckthefudge; lawsuit; limpdicklasnik; rapinbilljudge; seattle; thebabyharpsealcure; thelawisinmymouth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2018 5:52:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

how many divisions will he block us with?


2 posted on 08/01/2018 5:53:56 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Uh.... no he doesn’t.


3 posted on 08/01/2018 5:55:20 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Leftist judge employs censorship...next is bible burning.


5 posted on 08/01/2018 5:56:03 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (17...#1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Uh, that ship has sailed, bud.....


6 posted on 08/01/2018 6:00:26 AM PDT by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The judge might just as well repeal the law of gravity.


7 posted on 08/01/2018 6:00:53 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That cat’s out of the bag. It’s already been downloaded 1000x over. It’ll just be driven into the dark web and within tight circles.


8 posted on 08/01/2018 6:01:57 AM PDT by BBQToadRibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s the INTERNET. The WORLD WIDE WEB.

Yeah. Good luck with that.


9 posted on 08/01/2018 6:04:15 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Apparently Liberals only oppose prior restraint when Nixon is involved.


10 posted on 08/01/2018 6:04:43 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Send the blueprints to Kim.com...he is on a rampage for free speech this morning.


11 posted on 08/01/2018 6:05:12 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (17...#1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/gun-rights-activists-post-plans-3d-firearms-after-judge-s-n896411


12 posted on 08/01/2018 6:06:27 AM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where is this so called “judge” getting the authority to do this?


13 posted on 08/01/2018 6:06:43 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a suit challenging the Trump administration’s

This inferior court has no more authority to issue this ruling where a "State" is the petitioner than I have.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.
14 posted on 08/01/2018 6:10:42 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Um... people already have them. Bit late.


15 posted on 08/01/2018 6:14:48 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Yeah, the Internet is the one medium where those files will spread like wildfire for the 3D gun files, just like p0rn. I’m guessing that the Google search for it should be ranking in the top 10,000 searches by now unless Google is up to their usual dirty tricks of suppression.


16 posted on 08/01/2018 6:23:41 AM PDT by prophetic (Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be made the Cat Food instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

With issues like this and immigration it is like playing judicial Wack-A-Mole. There seems to be no negative consequence to judges issuing national decrees. Why have a legislature?


17 posted on 08/01/2018 6:26:19 AM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Translation - Federal judge ignores the 1st Amendment and censors free speech.


18 posted on 08/01/2018 6:27:06 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Judge Lasnik can go screw himself. Here's a link to the code if anyone wants it:
CodeIsFreeSpeech.com

Pass it on. We will not submit, we will not comply.

19 posted on 08/01/2018 6:31:55 AM PDT by Jed Eckert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

At some point, these self-aggrandized judges simply need to be ignored for the pesky nuisances they’ve become.


20 posted on 08/01/2018 6:33:08 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson