Yeah, uh, chris. WTF are you talking about? Oh, he doesn’t know either but it sounded good on the air I suppose. Made him look/sound all “thinky” and stuff.
How about we attack the un-American, un-patriotic a-holes?
Actually, Trump did suggest they meet with him to iron out a way to address concerns
Yeah don’t worry about the ‘racist’ blacks just get the evil whites.
FU
*...So many protesting players, white and black, have said this isn’t about disrespecting the flag...*
Then why is it being done during our National Anthem????
Cuomo is an attack dog for the fascist left.
Yeah, It's just a coincidence that they take a knee during the national anthem while flag respecting people remain standing with their hand on their heart...
black separatists are racists too and back in the 60s MLK called them out for being every bit as wrong as the Klan.
Not only is there no obligation to agree with their position on the subject, there is independently reason to object to their choice of venue.
Cuomo is dug in on this though. He will blame Trump for the action of others, because Trump expressed a point of view. Cuomo is a hack.
So it's just a coincidence that the disrespect is displayed during the national anthem and presentation of the flag?
Cris - you are the racist. (Did I say that correctly. I mean that is what the left does when someone does not agree with them, claim they are “racist”) /s
“So many protesting players, white and black, have said this isn’t about disrespecting the flag.”
They can say that all they want, but it doesn’t change the fact that is what they are doing.
I love how he’s being called FREDO by Rush and Savage. It sticks. The pathetic weak brother.
Poor victimized blacks can do no wrong. It is all the fault of the evil white man. I’ve heard that crap all my life. It never gets better. Nothing will ever make it go away, so F-it. No more sympathy. Get with the program or suffer the consequences. Ain’t nobody got time for your BS.
The problems with liberals is they have NO discernment
1. White supremasists who should not be getting any attention from anyone.
2. Bunch of guys who are using the time fans paid $50 to $100 to virtue signal on someone else’s dime instead of doing their job and using their own time and money to help solve a problem
Gee those two things are exactly the same right? Why are liberals all so dumb?
He is attacking the racists.
They are protesting “white supremacy and police brutality.”
Affirmative action is black supremacy, and affirmative action runs everything these days.
Not to mention that “Hands up! Don’t shoot!” NEVER HAPPENED.
TWENTY FIVE TOP QUOTES FROM THE DOJ’S REPORT ON THE MICHAEL BROWN SHOOTING
[01] The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilson’s uses of deadly force were “objectively unreasonable” under the Supreme Court’s definition. (Page 5)
[02] when the store clerk tried to stop Brown, Brown used his physical size to stand over him and forcefully shove him away. (Page 6)
[03] Wilson was aware of the theft and had a description of the suspects as he encountered Brown and Witness 101. (Page 6)
[04] Autopsy results and bullet trajectory, skin from Brown’s palm on the outside of the SUV door as well as Brown’s DNA on the inside of the driver’s door corroborate Wilson’s account that during the struggle, Brown used his right hand to grab and attempt to control Wilson’s gun. (Page 6)
[05] there is no credible evidence to disprove Wilson’s account of what occurred inside the SUV. (Page 7)
[06] autopsy results confirm that Wilson did not shoot Brown in the back as he was running away because there were no entrance wounds to Brown’s back. (Page 7)
[07] witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts (Page 8)
[08] several witnesses stated that Brown appeared to pose a physical threat to Wilson as he moved toward Wilson. (Page 8)
[09] The physical evidence also establishes that Brown moved forward toward Wilson after he turned around to face him. The physical evidence is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. (Page 10)
[10] evidence does not establish that it was unreasonable for Wilson to perceive Brown as a threat while Brown was punching and grabbing him in the SUV and attempting to take his gun. (Page 11)
[11] Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses (Page 12)
[12] Wilson’s account was consistent with those results, and consistent with the accounts of other independent eyewitnesses, whose accounts were also consistent with the physical evidence. Wilson’s statements were consistent with each other in all material ways, and would not be subject to effective impeachment for inconsistencies or deviation from the physical evidence.8 Therefore, in analyzing all of the evidence, federal prosecutors found Wilson’s account to be credible. (Page 16)
[13] Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. (Page 78)
[14] Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilson’s account and are consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 78)
[15] several of these witnesses stated that they would have felt threatened by Brown and would have responded in the same way Wilson did. (Page 82)
[16] there are no witnesses who could testify credibly that Wilson shot Brown while Brown was clearly attempting to surrender. (Page 83)
[17] There is no witness who has stated that Brown had his hands up in surrender whose statement is otherwise consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 83)
[18] The media has widely reported that there is witness testimony that Brown said “don’t shoot” as he held his hands above his head. In fact, our investigation did not reveal any eyewitness who stated that Brown said “don’t shoot.” (Page 83)
[19] Wilson did not know that Brown was not armed at the time he shot him, and had reason to suspect that he might be when Brown reached into the waistband of his pants as he advanced toward Wilson. (Page 84)
[20] Wilson did not have time to determine whether Brown had a gun and was not required to risk being shot himself in order to make a more definitive assessment.
[21] In addition, even assuming that Wilson definitively knew that Brown was not armed, Wilson was aware that Brown had already assaulted him once and attempted to gain control of his gun. (Page 85)
[22] Wilson has a strong argument that he was justified in firing his weapon at Brown as he continued to advance toward him and refuse commands to stop, and the law does not require Wilson to wait until Brown was close enough to physically assault Wilson. (Page 85)
[23] we must avoid substituting our personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene. We must never allow the theoretical, sanitized world of our imagination to replace the dangerous and complex world that policemen face every day.” (Page 85)
[24] “It may appear, in the calm aftermath, that an officer could have taken a different course, but we do not hold the police to such a demanding standard.” (citing Gardner v. Buerger, 82 F.3d 248, 251 (8th Cir. 1996) (same))). Rather, where, as here, an officer points his gun at a suspect to halt his advance, that suspect should be on notice that “escalation of the situation would result in the use of the firearm.” Estate of Morgan at 498. An officer is permitted to continue firing until the threat is neutralized. See Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2022 (2014) (“Officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended”). For all of the reasons stated, Wilson’s conduct in shooting Brown as he advanced on Wilson, and until he fell to the ground, was not objectively unreasonable and thus not a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. (Page 85)
[25] Given that Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses, to include aspects of the testimony of Witness 101, there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat. (Page 86)
For the reasons set forth above, this matter lacks prosecutive merit and should be closed.
BOYCOTT THE NFL!!!™
Just ask him.
I’ve shut most black dominated sports and there is nothing they can do to get me back. I know exactly what most of them feel about me and my country.