Posted on 09/03/2018 11:07:36 AM PDT by Pinkbell
Full Title:
Omarosa secretly recorded 'nearly every conversation' she ever had in the White House - including one with the ENTIRE Trump family, claims insider
Manigault Newman said the recordings were a form a protection and means of reference.
One of the conversations exposed last month was Manigault Newman's firing by chief of staff John Kelly in the high-security Situation Room.
Parts of it were played on the air during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press' to promote Manigault Newman's new book, 'Unhinged,' which has seen a slump in sales.
The tell-all memoir from the controversial reality star released on August 14, and dropped more than 40 percent in sales this week.
The recording took place in the room that is a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. Staff are not permitted to bring in cell phones or other recording devices.
Small lockers have been positioned outside the door so aides can securely leave prohibited devices during critical meetings.
Manigault Newman said the recordings were a form a protection and means of reference.
One of the conversations exposed last month was Manigault Newman's firing by chief of staff John Kelly in the high-security Situation Room.
Parts of it were played on the air during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press' to promote Manigault Newman's new book, 'Unhinged,' which has seen a slump in sales.
The tell-all memoir from the controversial reality star released on August 14, and dropped more than 40 percent in sales this week.
The recording took place in the room that is a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. Staff are not permitted to bring in cell phones or other recording devices.
Small lockers have been positioned outside the door so aides can securely leave prohibited devices during critical meetings.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
isn’t she thin? that dress makes her look like she explodes with fat just below the breasts, accented by what looks like flabby bare upper arm. why would she want to show that off on her wedding day?
Bingo!
my thought as well. Curious about the legality of this.
not appearing before a grand jury - Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley
assassinates policeman by shooting them from behind numerous
Recording conversations of cabinet officials, special councils, chief of Staff and the POTUS - Omarosa
None of these will be prosecuted if the perpetrator is a left wing miscreant.
HELLO, isn’t that ILLEGAL to record someone without their consent..imagine if she had done this to Obama, the reaction of the Commie libs in the media would be calling for her head
Her final recording in the SCIF will be/should be her undoing.
You may be onto something, but I think it only applies when the president or his staff are asked to testify about things.
I'm not sure if it protects him or his staff from espionage interlopers.
You know, if you get down to it, she was utilizing a tactic of espionage. There may be a violation of some sort related to and espionage act, where intent to disburse for espionage purposes isn't even required. It may be that if you tape secret information, you're in serious trouble, disbursal or not.
After I wrote that paragraph, I decided to see if I could find a section of the Espionage Act that addressed this sort of thing. Here is what I found.
This from the WikiPedia entry for, "The Espionage Act of 1917".
1950 McCarran Internal Security Act
In 1950, during the McCarthy Period, Congress passed the McCarran Internal Security Act over President Harry S. Truman's veto. It modified a large body of law, including espionage law. One addition was 793(e), which had almost exactly the same language as 793(d). According to Edgar and Schmidt, the added section potentially removes the "intent" to harm or aid requirement and may make "mere retention" of information a crime no matter what the intent, covering even former government officials writing their memoirs. They also describe McCarran saying that this portion was intended directly to respond to the case of Alger Hiss and the "Pumpkin Papers".[17][54][55]
This woman may have opened herself up to some real trouble, if someone decides to pursue it.
Well Trump invited her in! Bad decision on his part!
I think he let his heart (compassion) overrule his head.
Remember Trump thought that after a few months “they” would accept Hellary’s defeat and political discourse would decay back to the normal levels of partisanship. Trump told Limbaugh that, and Limbaugh told Trump in so many words, ‘No that’s not going to happen! The backlash is going to be unbelievable and will not quickly end!’. I think Trump now understands what Limbaugh meant.
She actually picked out that dress on an episode of my guilty please show on TLC: SAY YES TO THE DRESS. There is nothing that woman does that she doesn’t want everyone to see. It’s a beautiful dress. I think it’s just a bad picture unless she gained a crap load of weight between teh show and the wedding. Again, classic narcissist and mean.
Surley there are laws she broke.
If this story is true, it proves she never intended to
to be loyal to this administration or to Trump.
Why is she not in jail?
Jeff Sessions DOJ.
If true, WH security needs a thorough cleansing.
How is this legal? And isn’t this a violation of the espionage act? How do you know she wasn’t taping these meetings and selling it to the highest bidder?
She has now burnt every bridge.
Trump paid for her reception, I think it was $30,000.
Arrest the bitch!
Trump was trying to be inclusive . You cannot blame him for that effort. 38% of blacks now support what he is doing. That is awesome. She was the snake that he talked about on the campaign. She is now deeply despised and will drift from camp to camp among the communists but she is finished by the American people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.