Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Omarosa secretly recorded 'nearly every conversation' she ever had in the White House
Daily Mail ^ | September 2, 2018

Posted on 09/03/2018 11:07:36 AM PDT by Pinkbell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Pinkbell
Does this look like a mature, emotionally stable woman, or does it look like someone with serious mental disorders? You decide!


21 posted on 09/03/2018 11:22:36 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ("Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

isn’t she thin? that dress makes her look like she explodes with fat just below the breasts, accented by what looks like flabby bare upper arm. why would she want to show that off on her wedding day?


22 posted on 09/03/2018 11:27:14 AM PDT by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

Bingo!


23 posted on 09/03/2018 11:28:25 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

my thought as well. Curious about the legality of this.


24 posted on 09/03/2018 11:29:41 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
If I have to point to the single negative about Trump's presidency so far, it's this - too many bad hires in high-visibility positions that need to be terminated in messy firings shortly afterward.

How did she get recording equipment through White House security anyway? Do these people not have to undergo the same security scans to get into the White House that the rest of us do to get in concert arenas?
25 posted on 09/03/2018 11:29:49 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
Crimes like

not appearing before a grand jury - Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley

assassinates policeman by shooting them from behind numerous

Recording conversations of cabinet officials, special councils, chief of Staff and the POTUS - Omarosa

None of these will be prosecuted if the perpetrator is a left wing miscreant.

26 posted on 09/03/2018 11:30:30 AM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

HELLO, isn’t that ILLEGAL to record someone without their consent..imagine if she had done this to Obama, the reaction of the Commie libs in the media would be calling for her head


27 posted on 09/03/2018 11:31:14 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Her final recording in the SCIF will be/should be her undoing.


28 posted on 09/03/2018 11:33:39 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weston
I couldn't say yes or no with regard to this.

You may be onto something, but I think it only applies when the president or his staff are asked to testify about things.

I'm not sure if it protects him or his staff from espionage interlopers.

You know, if you get down to it, she was utilizing a tactic of espionage. There may be a violation of some sort related to and espionage act, where intent to disburse for espionage purposes isn't even required. It may be that if you tape secret information, you're in serious trouble, disbursal or not.

After I wrote that paragraph, I decided to see if I could find a section of the Espionage Act that addressed this sort of thing. Here is what I found.

This from the WikiPedia entry for, "The Espionage Act of 1917".

1950 McCarran Internal Security Act

In 1950, during the McCarthy Period, Congress passed the McCarran Internal Security Act over President Harry S. Truman's veto. It modified a large body of law, including espionage law. One addition was 793(e), which had almost exactly the same language as 793(d). According to Edgar and Schmidt, the added section potentially removes the "intent" to harm or aid requirement and may make "mere retention" of information a crime no matter what the intent, covering even former government officials writing their memoirs. They also describe McCarran saying that this portion was intended directly to respond to the case of Alger Hiss and the "Pumpkin Papers".[17][54][55]

This woman may have opened herself up to some real trouble, if someone decides to pursue it.

29 posted on 09/03/2018 11:35:25 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: weston

Source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917


30 posted on 09/03/2018 11:36:48 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

Well Trump invited her in! Bad decision on his part!
I think he let his heart (compassion) overrule his head.

Remember Trump thought that after a few months “they” would accept Hellary’s defeat and political discourse would decay back to the normal levels of partisanship. Trump told Limbaugh that, and Limbaugh told Trump in so many words, ‘No that’s not going to happen! The backlash is going to be unbelievable and will not quickly end!’. I think Trump now understands what Limbaugh meant.


31 posted on 09/03/2018 11:48:06 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: b4me

She actually picked out that dress on an episode of my guilty please show on TLC: SAY YES TO THE DRESS. There is nothing that woman does that she doesn’t want everyone to see. It’s a beautiful dress. I think it’s just a bad picture unless she gained a crap load of weight between teh show and the wedding. Again, classic narcissist and mean.


32 posted on 09/03/2018 11:59:00 AM PDT by Hildy (Don't get bitter, get better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Surley there are laws she broke.
If this story is true, it proves she never intended to
to be loyal to this administration or to Trump.


33 posted on 09/03/2018 12:03:02 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

Why is she not in jail?

Jeff Sessions DOJ.


34 posted on 09/03/2018 12:05:58 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

If true, WH security needs a thorough cleansing.


35 posted on 09/03/2018 12:12:49 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

How is this legal? And isn’t this a violation of the espionage act? How do you know she wasn’t taping these meetings and selling it to the highest bidder?


36 posted on 09/03/2018 12:14:37 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

She has now burnt every bridge.


37 posted on 09/03/2018 12:16:50 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Trump paid for her reception, I think it was $30,000.


38 posted on 09/03/2018 12:17:07 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Arrest the bitch!


39 posted on 09/03/2018 12:30:35 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Trump was trying to be inclusive . You cannot blame him for that effort. 38% of blacks now support what he is doing. That is awesome. She was the snake that he talked about on the campaign. She is now deeply despised and will drift from camp to camp among the communists but she is finished by the American people.


40 posted on 09/03/2018 12:30:55 PM PDT by raiderboy (Trump promised “shut down the government” in September; if no wall!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson